Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
SCHiM
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
151.
▲
by
SCHiM
6y ago
A thing that I found missing is that legacy systems' influence is much larger than only the systems it directly touches. Through particular requirements that some of these systems have they might shape policy too! I primarily deal in s
152.
▲
by
SCHiM
6y ago
Ehh, don't you think that actually makes it worse? I don't know about you, but even if the government does not have a legitimate democratic mandate, it still has a larger say than a foreign country. Especially if you consider that
153.
▲
by
SCHiM
6y ago
That is after you've downloaded the data. Skimmers these days can be read out remotely. You don't need to do anything obvious. You don't need to come back to the atm once you've got what you came for.
154.
▲
by
SCHiM
6y ago
The escrow can build up trust with high volume low amount transactions, i.e. your regular drug transactions. I think all dark markets to date had some escrow systems in place eventually.
155.
▲
by
SCHiM
6y ago
Very interesting. I'm trying to do something closely related for other reasons. One thing I'm thinking of is that it might be possible to brute-force the semantics of short snippets of code using genetic algorithms. A similar tech
156.
▲
by
SCHiM
6y ago
Sounds like a directory traversal to me :) It's generally a bad idea to have the user in control of filenames you create if those files are not on a device they own.
157.
▲
by
SCHiM
6y ago
Pivot to OSCP instead. CISSP will have you learn the required strength of a light bulb to light the alley behind the office. OSCP will introduce you to overflowing a buffer and pwning a remote service... I know which one I find preferable
158.
▲
by
SCHiM
6y ago
As a hacker, I see a very easily exploitable flaw in your proposed solution :)
159.
▲
by
SCHiM
6y ago
True true, wasn't meant to be hostile but I see that I wrote my comment unkindly. I do think the point stands though. They are names for the same technology. How it is used, and who uses it will determine what type of spin I'd put
160.
▲
by
SCHiM
6y ago
Microsoft.trust?
161.
▲
by
SCHiM
6y ago
Well, you could try googling for DRM, same beast different name.
162.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
Most stringently disagree. There are numerous examples in history where do-good measures have later been abused in the most abhorrent manner possible. In fact, I'm living in a place whose history is influenced by one of these examples[
163.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
Human decision making is terrifyingly biased. The fear that currently grips the world and its leaders is perfect cover for leaders bent on a totalitarian streak. 'Doing what is right', 'fighting this and that'. Your own
164.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
While I think that's a valid point to make. My perspective on that is that, given contradicting reports and initial confusion, you can't fault any organization or person not picking out the correct response in the total state spac
165.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
This is because of DRM integrations. If any part of the chain between netflix and secure memory in your display cannot be verified, or does not meet some standard, you get the degraded experience.
166.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
I'm reasonably sure it's in jest: """ I went to random.org and generated 32 sets of 256 no-repeat numbers between 0 and 255 inclusive. """ We have someone with the practical cryptographic knowledge to
167.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
Notice what the quote in the article, and the points made in the comments below, reveal? Humans compare with their reference group. As your status increases you'll step out of your old group and into a new one. And then the cycle start
168.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
Although nice in theory, contemporary implementations of the same scheme leave a lot to be desired. Take Windows' control flow guard (CFG) as a practical example. The scope of valid indirect branch targets is so vast that even with CFG
169.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
The contract is published online. It certainly describes "circumventing physical security measures", such as locks. The contract is signed by an authority for which there was no reasonable doubt that they were not authorized to ap
170.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
Isn't there a similar mechanism in humans though? Like this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6127768/ """ One the most provocative observations regarding Holocaust offspring w
171.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
An NT hash can be used as a credential all by itself, no need to crack those ;)
172.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
What a delightful piece of writing! The three catagories really seem to fit. It explains the frequent arguments about electron vs native, new JavaScript libraries and battle tested C. Wonderful and insightful.
173.
▲
Android exploits more expensive than iOS for the first time
(twitter.com)
1 points
by
SCHiM
7y ago
|
0 comments
174.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
I got this too! Quite sure my account is not compromised, have 2fa and a keepass password. The invites appear to be sent from my own e-mail address. Is this a separate issue? No third part access to calendar either.
175.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
2./2.1./4. Yes this is true, and that's exactly where root of my problem with this direction of research lies. The incentives of software vendors are partially misaligned with those of the users. A vendor will want to maximiz
176.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
My opinion: this is an idiotic thing to do. I got triggered in a huge way by this for a number of reasons: 1. An attacker skilled enough to perform black box binary fuzzing, and create a testing harnass. Will only be minimally hindered by a
177.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
Is anyone in Hong Kong proactively setting up communication channels to the outside in case the military cracks down? In a worst case scenario it'd be good to have reliable high-bandwidth communication channels to the outside world. Th
178.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
Indeed. Looking at the descriptions of the attacks all these are simple. They probably would have occurred to any halfway competent attacker looking at ways to DOS your sever in the first several hours of playing around with it. Consider th
179.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
An authoritative regime cannot allow open resistance to its power. Idea extracted from [0]. It signals to less-than-loyal supporters of the regime that they can take a bigger slice of the available resources, leading to instability. [0]: h
180.
▲
by
SCHiM
7y ago
I noticed this too! We have no insight in how this works 'under the hood'. But this one really disappeared disturbingly fast.
More ›