Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Rygian
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
50 ms
·
811.
▲
Top security risks of dedicated short-range communication (DSRC)
(roboticsbiz.com)
2 points
by
Rygian
4y ago
|
0 comments
812.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Somehow that reminds me of startups like Contentsquare.
813.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
My immediate reaction was that the creepy thing is not the condition itself, but the mindset to duct-tape a PVC pipe to their heads just so they can keep cycling. Reminds me of another comment today elsewhere in HN citing the classic "
814.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Sticking with Google means students have no privacy, due to the US government being able to summarily monitor their Google data. Even if Google promises the processing happens in Europe. It's not "clarify where the data is process
815.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/305167/what-did-...
816.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
> An AI device filled to the brim with sensors, cameras, GPS and with remote connectivity Is therefore filled to the brim with valuables that an old car doesn't have. Take for example the ZiGGY [1]. I predict that within 24 hours of
817.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Late reply. I really disagree. Whether the cookie shows under a dns name or another means next to nothing as to who is doing the tracking. If I'm not mistaken, Google Analytics is now pushing to have all cookies served by a front domai
818.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
What business advantage does it being to Apple to (just) stop those data leaks?
819.
▲
A Guide to Mindful Communication in Code Reviews
(kickstarter.engineering)
2 points
by
Rygian
4y ago
|
0 comments
820.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
You were right initially. First-party or third-party is not a useful distinction from a privacy point of view. If you want analytics, anonymize first and then use whatever tracking you want. But first price that your anonymizing is really e
821.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Not sure what you think "the product" is and how it would help your mom. The relevant part of the article is about selling you smartwatches, selling doctors software so they can share your medical history with Google, and selling
822.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Processing of personal information is unlawful except in the conditions listed in the article. So "exceptional" in the sense that they are exceptions to a more general rule, as of opposed to the sense of being extraordinary.
823.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Self-hosting does not automatically make your analytics legal, on the other hand. Processing of your users' personal data is legal only in the few exceptional scenarios outlined in Article 6. https://gdprinfo.eu/en-arti
824.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
No, you keep paying the same or more.
825.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Easy to imagine: patient records will now include ads for expensive drugs. Doctors can make $ on the side by referring patients to Google Pharma. Drug labs can dig a moat around their products by buying ad placements in doctors' digita
826.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
The useful distinction being "members of" vs "elected representatives." I live in an European country. I cannot for the life of me figure out in which way would (a consortium of) private companies come up with something
827.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Privatizing means giving control to "the few whose only incentive is to make more money." Which is worse beyond doubt.
828.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
If anything, the reverse is a security risk: applications that steal focus while I am typing down a password.
829.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
As owner of an EV since 2019, I have never wanted that sort of thing. Maybe a 32 amp charger instead of a flimsy extension cord (that I cap to 5 amps). But in any case, my car starts charging in the evening, and I have enough charge for my
830.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Except, you know, for actual tables. :-)
831.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Case in point: the GDPR is a privacy law that mandates, among many other things, that the systems involved are conceived, built and maintained with proper security considerations. https://gdpr-info.eu/art-32-gdpr/
832.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
The author is criticizing Obsidian for bad security, which in turn results in bad privacy guarantees. The two concepts are tightly dependent and should not be disentangled.
833.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Radar is basically false positives everywhere. Ultrasound is few meters deep max. Lidar is a clunky wart that no modern production car carries at the moment, afaik.
834.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Just to be clear, you want to make TACC + lane-keep illegal? Because that's what the comment is taking about.
835.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
The author addresses your point 1 directly: you can't provide acceptable privacy guaranteed is your software is not secure. Developer's intent with regards to privacy is necessary but not sufficient.
836.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
This seems like an obvious argument, so it is a shame it has to be spoken out loud: you can't provide privacy if your software is not secure.
837.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
"Bazil separates knowledge of a file from the contents of the file, letting the laptop know about all of the files, without having to store the contents of the file." Yes, it hits the nail on the head! This approach is probably at
838.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
Thanks for sharing, awesome work! Indeed, this has some similarities to the problem I'm addressing. I wouldn't go as far as saying it "solves exactly the problem." A couple of points where it diverges: it is backed by IP
839.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
I was fully unaware of this article when I posted [1] about my ideas on a Personal File System, and now I realize there is a lot of common ground between them. I particularly like that this article gives specific, actionable advice to any a
840.
▲
by
Rygian
4y ago
The add-on page says: "This add-on is not actively monitored for security by Mozilla. Make sure you trust it before installing." As things stand today, gaining my trust would require some work on my side (and I'm a profession
More ›