RyanIyengar

11 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by RyanIyengar 14y ago

   "Certainly there are reasons for concern if lower-income Americans aren't able to save or acquire sufficient capital to pursue innovative ideas, or to see their children attend decent schools. They will suffer, and the country will lose out
2. 32.▲
   by RyanIyengar 14y ago

   Sent you a message regarding this. Cool idea man, I like the tracks.
3. 33.▲
   by RyanIyengar 14y ago

   The argument has never been that it is impossible to rise from poverty. The argument is that it is demonstrably massively unlikely.
4. 34.▲
   by RyanIyengar 14y ago

   Is it?
5. 35.▲
   by RyanIyengar 14y ago

   "Person who takes lunch from the fridge" isn't a protected class as far as I know, and a lot of states are basically "at-will", which means you don't really need a reason to fire anybody at any time.
6. 36.▲
   by RyanIyengar 14y ago

   Speaking of implicit assumptions, your "not the case" is contrasted with your statement of "skills and desire", so you're basically implying that you wouldn't be depressed since this is just a normal occurrence, some women just don't measur
7. 37.▲
   by RyanIyengar 14y ago

   Which compared to the highest percentage cited at 24%, is quite high.