Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Rury
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
Isn't the need right now the need for more intelligent, context-aware software? I mean, I feel like we've barely touched on what applications AI could be used in, that we have only just begun to start developing. It's tech th
32.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
People are describing the results when they say models are non-deterministic. Give it the same exact input twice, and you'll get two different outputs. Deterministic would mean the same input always gives the same output.
33.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
Right, giving up is actually how these things end up becoming principles/laws. Power centralizes because people become complacent and ignorant on matters of power, so there ends up being a power vacuum, to which others seize the opport
34.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
You'd consider that a fair comparison? I mean, it's not like the lego inventor is trying to shove legos down kids' throats against their will. These AI promoters on the other hand... are absolutely trying to thrust things aga
35.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
It's even potentially worse than that. As a whole, it doesn't even require a majority, if a small amount are complacent or ignorant. And depending on competency, it might not matter if the majority protest anyhow.
36.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
That's because that statement is marginal. The founding father's were very keen to the arguments given by political theorists of their time, such as Locke. It's a large reason why the 1st and 2nd amendment are the two first a
37.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
You'd be right to be suspicious. The term "steelman" arose from people who misunderstand the term "strawman". Such people coined it out of the idea thinking that a strawman was an an attempt to make an opponents arg
38.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
I don't disagree, but at some point, I think people need to understand we're dealing with laws of nature here. I mean just look at human history, this has been a problem since the dawn of civilization... I think if you truly under
39.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
That's just architects in a nutshell, and stems from the division of labor. They're primarily tasked with designing a grand vision, and because of that, aesthetics and features naturally end up being primary concerns they deal wit
40.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
I like the non brightened version, where you can clearly see the light coming from cities. How cool would it be if we saw similar on another planet...
41.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
Not sure, but I'd wager it was shot down using their 358 missile (aka SA-67). The missile can be fired from a rail on a truck and will patrol an airspace for a time until finding a target using an infrared seeker. Since it uses an infr
42.
▲
by
Rury
6mo ago
Free markets don't exist, or they only do for a very brief period of time. It's the same fundamental force behind why social hierarchies naturally form, and communism doesn't work in practice. When governments kowtow to corpo
43.
▲
by
Rury
7mo ago
I'd argue it's a subsidy/incentive problem. Since every subsidy works by raising a cost somewhere which is used to subsidize a cost elsewhere, I'm inclined to believe in the Bennett hypothesis. Our government mostly subs
44.
▲
by
Rury
7mo ago
Yes, instead of banks lending sub prime mortgages directly, it's as if they are lending to private equity groups who are then lending rather undiscerningly. Within the last week, we now have Blackstone, Blackrock, Owl, and Morgan Stane
45.
▲
by
Rury
7mo ago
That's not necessarily a result of AI, you also have to consider the broader economic environment. I mean, it was also difficult to get a job as a graduate in 2008, whereas it's typically been easier to get a job when credit is ch
46.
▲
by
Rury
7mo ago
In that case, you spent $80 to produce an item and exchanged it for $100 worth of their stock. Now if you check, these companies selling their stock like this tend to have large amounts of debt. If their stock becomes worthless, you just wa
47.
▲
by
Rury
8mo ago
It's just hard. I mean... it could very well be, that there's so many deeper layers underneath what we know in particle physics, but from our scale, also so infeasible to build something to analyze and decompose the nuanced behavi
48.
▲
by
Rury
8mo ago
Because they're not actually equivalents. Gold has unique properties as a material, unique properties that are useful. It'd be more widely used in industry if it wasn't such a scarce and expensive material. Bitcoin on the oth
49.
▲
by
Rury
8mo ago
Yeah, I personally believe women's longer lifespan mostly stems from a lower caloric intake. Studies have long suggested that reducing caloric intake can be one of the best things you can do for health and extending lifespan. And this
50.
▲
by
Rury
11mo ago
How will taxpayers even pay if they don't have jobs?
51.
▲
by
Rury
1y ago
> people's bed didn't work because the company that makes them architected things such that they have absolute control. Curious, but what bed/company do you speak of?
52.
▲
by
Rury
1y ago
He's right. The very reason free markets don't exist is the same exact reason why communism doesn't work in practice. All markets collapse until there's a few dominant businesses (ie monopolies), just as how society natu
53.
▲
by
Rury
1y ago
I don't understand. > I have noticed a lot of debt hysteria from people who don't seem to understand basic accounting. That is, one party's asset is another party's liability. This is correct, but... let me ask you, w
54.
▲
by
Rury
1y ago
Do you know WSDL? If you do, it's kind of the same concept behind consuming WSDL, just for AI applications...
55.
▲
by
Rury
1y ago
Frankly, I wouldn't agree with the article, and call having different quality options at different prices, "price discrimination", even if consumers are discriminating based on price. That's just offering a selection of
56.
▲
by
Rury
1y ago
> ... you make a request ... Sounds like the work of mustering up instructions... like programming... So how do these LLM's completely remove us from having to do this work of mustering up instructions? Seems to me someone still has
57.
▲
by
Rury
2y ago
> The Navy isn’t constrained by economics And solar less so than nuclear. Nuclear receives only ~1-3% of energy subsidies in the US [1]. [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_subsidies_in_the_United...
58.
▲
by
Rury
2y ago
I disagree with the notion that life isn't zero sum. It only looks this way using a definition that conflates wealth with value, or from a viewpoint far from the limits of nature that would otherwise make this kind of nature obvious. A
59.
▲
by
Rury
2y ago
No I understand dual key encryption, and like I said, there is still something stored (the key as well as the passwords in the vault). What you do not understand is how this is inherently less secure than not storing anything at all. To giv
60.
▲
by
Rury
2y ago
Your the one that's grasping at straws and doesn't understand that 1P needs to store something in order to validate or generate your master password. The fact that this does happen, makes it less secure in comparison to not storin
More ›