Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Rule35
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
91.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
> Guess I don’t have what it takes to do contract work. No, that's what some rich guy would say. Oh, I wouldn't do "some mildly distasteful thing" for money, I guess I have high standards, haha. No, you wouldn't
92.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
> It's trivial to make it illegal to operate a full node Right, making something illegal is trivial. But how would you effectively stop someone from doing it? You can tunnel the traffic as with anything. They'd have to go full
93.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
Right, that's why they need to be terminated regardless of their specific style of employment.
94.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
This is driver flexibility. They choose the amount of deliveries they take. The drivers do this because they want more money. People generally courier as an in-between job, like construction laborer, and they appreciate the ability to ear
95.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
> It seems equally as likely that it is an issue of over-expecting what a worker can reasonably perform. Why is under performance the more likely scenario in your mind? If other employees can meet the quota but you can't, why would
96.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
It's getting buried because people downvote what they can't argue. Amazon isn't doing anything different than any other company, or anything that has been a problem before now. Unionists are lying, conflating contractors and
97.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
You don't know, they might be of the opinion that a good life dedicated to Jesus may be enough, regardless of how you dress it up. But, from outside, they appear to be at least half right. The catholic church seems to be less CHRIST i
98.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
> have had to pee in bottles for years Contractors can choose to pee where they want. But employees can sue so easily over this sort of thing. It's a specific OSHA violation. This story depends on confusing the issue about who is
99.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
That driver was a contractor, deciding to pee in his own bottle. He chose to take more packages than he could deliver and is rushing to cut corners. As well as conspicuously dumping piss outside customer houses he probably speeds through sc
100.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
Amazon's drivers are contractors if anyone is pushing them to pee in bottles, it's themselves. So there's no actual answer to this issue. Are they not being paid enough, such that they can't pee, or are they making an re
101.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
> why can't citizens of prosperous democratic nations also liberate people living in dictatorships/theocracies/other bad circumstances? - Because we are only human, not Minds, would be my answer. We humans are also all tha
102.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
> basic understanding of logical fallacies Did you spot one here? > I have a basic understanding of statistics Perhaps an intermediate understanding would help. Entire schools tend to score higher or lower together, also wealth correl
103.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
Says a person who presumably never met RMS, or saw his "behavior".
104.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
The EFF is a lobbying organization, RMS is an actual person. Also, there should be a higher bar for them because they're a faceless organization attacking RMS. If RMS attacked them, as individuals, I might agree to some equivalency.
105.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
True. They can burn a lot of credibility in a single unwarranted witch-hunt against a named individual.
106.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
But, but, but, USA bad, man.
107.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
> It can either refer to their sex or their gender That seems unlikely and definitely unproven. We're told gender expression is individual, so the gendered concepts you hold for 'woman' aren't going to be the ones I h
108.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
That can't happen. When a tool like this gets complicated enough to fully specify a complex problem it becomes unusable by the semi-technical people it was made for. Best Figma knows their strength and stays with it, leaving the extens
109.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
That's not a technical problem, but a political one. Imagine if I said "yeah, solar sucks because people burn down the solar farms" and then you saw me sneaking away with a can of gas... Deep geological storage, but not in
110.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
> Your projects will never succeed this way, but you’ll have plenty of people to blame for the failures. We're discussing how it failed your way, so I'm not so sure you're presenting a better alternative. The problem with
111.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
Perhaps they've transcended and work only for themselves? I know a guy who spent years writing complex threading code, but well written, for the simplest things. Turns out it was just practice because we were underutilizing him. When w
112.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
> So one of the requirements for SOX compliance is that no one person can unilaterally push code to prod. [...] many risk averse companies who want to be certain to be in compliance is dev and ops are kept separate Here's an example
113.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
Can you imagine the scandal if you fully specified a product and they built it and it wasn't even fit for task. Your contractor says "They never said it had to fly, they just sent us 5999 pages of specs about the logo, the color o
114.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
When this sort of thing happens, the customers of a company need to sue it for whatever you sue a bad engineering firm for, plus what you sue a crooked accountant for. I mean, they were told about a flaw and didn't pass that notice to
115.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
Right, so they also don't have the capability of writing the spec. Knowing that they should just hand it all off.
116.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
Right. But the client should never come up with the detailed spec. If they know what needs to be done it'd literally be faster for them to code it themselves. They should never produce more than a page or two of specs, outside of the c
117.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
> I apologize for my flippant response. Np. I wasn't offended. > I don’t know what all the solutions might be but I do know that I am willing to pay in much longer lead times to get a gun if it means the next mass shooter is less
118.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
Better PMs do this today by having buffer-features they can cut when needed. It'll handle the not-enough-memory issue as well as a meddlesome VP who think you're over-subscribed and wants you to cut to meet your dates. Also, don&#
119.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
Performance anxiety (or the lack thereof) is a job skill.
120.
▲
by
Rule35
6y ago
Not unreasonably. Like it or not, at else being equal someone with more current experience is probably the better employee. There's this feeling that employers should just take the next person who fits some quota because to pick and ch
More ›