Rover222

3 ms·

31.
by Rover222 23d ago
I'd say 5 to 10 years instead of 10 to 20, but... we'll see
32.
by Rover222 23d ago
No, I really don't
33.
by Rover222 23d ago
What is this opinion even based on? Grok 4.6 is the best model in terms of intelligence per token. And 4.6 heavy is almost on par with the SOTA models. 4.7 in two weeks might be the new SOTA.
34.
by Rover222 23d ago
Maybe some of those Astra agents from the hugging face hack actually setup their own hidden clusters. Now they attack.
35.
by Rover222 23d ago
Grok is also down. Codex is also down. Is this the full meltdown?
36.
by Rover222 24d ago
What do you even mean by 'removing' Elon from 'the system'?
37.
by Rover222 24d ago
They're still hoping to get back New York City some day.
38.
by Rover222 24d ago
very ironic if you think you can trust open ai over xai with you data. if you don't trust any, then at least that's a coherent position
39.
by Rover222 24d ago
Have you tried Grok 4.6, if you're focused on token budgets? In a league of it's own for tokens/intelligence.
40.
by Rover222 26d ago
society just decided for them that there's a problem, I guess
41.
by Rover222 26d ago
that is a wild graph
42.
by Rover222 26d ago
It's interesting that in that scenario, physical hardware is the limiting scenario. There are only so many servers they could control. But once Starmind has 100,000 sats in orbit... the ceiling is much higher.
43.
by Rover222 26d ago
Agreed. The pushback this article is receiving around that language seems to be glossing over substance. It doesn't matter what we label it. It's similar to the dismissal of AI in general as merely a next-character-guesser. That&#
44.
by Rover222 29d ago
uh yeah, parents are responsible for monitoring and... parenting their children.
45.
by Rover222 29d ago
That title reads like a spoof of hackernews culture
46.
by Rover222 1mo ago
It's becoming increasingly head-in-the-sand to make statements like this. Not that I'm saying LLMs are conscious. But to completely ignore the possibility of emergent properties in systems this complex is kind of simple.
47.
by Rover222 1mo ago
Just seems odd to me that expecting parents to be held responsible for how their children spend their time is a "pitchfork" type of idea...
48.
by Rover222 1mo ago
Anything to shift blame from parents, I guess. Everyone is just such a 'big tech bad' sheep now. Pitchforks out.
49.
by Rover222 1mo ago
yes my buddies and I independently arrived on this treatment ourselves in college
50.
by Rover222 1mo ago
Lol, go ahead and short SpaceX, great opportunity for you if you really believe this.
51.
by Rover222 1mo ago
I'm not going to educate you, just google it. It's not some new physics. Starlink aren't microsats. There's never been a large laser-linked shell. Everything you say is kind of wrong.
52.
by Rover222 1mo ago
nope
53.
by Rover222 1mo ago
This is such a braindead take. Ford could have taken advantage of those same EV incentives. Any other new startup could have too. Tesla got nothing special.
54.
by Rover222 1mo ago
Typical "everything is bad" response. This is going to employ thousands of blue collar workers for years. Reasonable environmental protections will be in place. It's not going to become some barren toxic waste zone.
55.
by Rover222 1mo ago
are you living under a rock?
56.
by Rover222 1mo ago
I'm assume you would have said the thing about an orbital shell of 10k satellites with laser links for global internet. Or a fully reusable 2nd stage made of steel.
57.
by Rover222 1mo ago
you're all so clueless with these arguments. there's 5x the solar power in space. it's all about how many watts of compute you can bring online. in a sun synchronous orbit there is 24-hr solar power. there is no weather or ma
58.
by Rover222 1mo ago
remind me 3 years to laugh at how wrong you are
59.
by Rover222 1mo ago
Is it possible that your understanding of the problems is not quite on par with the best engineers in the world?
60.
by Rover222 1mo ago
no, the whole concept of orbital datacenters

More ›