Rounin

8 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by Rounin 8y ago

   From the paper: 1. "It follows that we cannot prove our Free Will assumption – determinism, like solipsism, is logically possible." So not a proof of free will. 2. "Although we find ourselves unable to give an operational def
2. 62.▲
   by Rounin 8y ago

   How about "proceeding, made, or occurring without definite aim, reason, or pattern". From https://www.dictionary.com/browse/random .
3. 63.▲
   by Rounin 8y ago

   As far a I can tell from the article, Conway doesn't prove the existence of free will at all, not even attempt to do so. Instead he explores what the implications of free will would be if it exists. And despite the claim to the contrar
4. 64.▲
   by Rounin 8y ago

   It seems eerily reminiscent of those terrible passages in the Gospel of Matthew, where Jesus warns of those of those who "shall not be forgiven", "either in this age or in the age to come". https://www.biblega