RogerL

97 ms·

871.
by RogerL 13y ago
Functional programming works great for processing data - you don't want to change the data, and there isn't a lot of state. You largely write various transforms and filters, which is right in FP's wheelhouse. On the other han
872.
by RogerL 13y ago
Okay, I name you Patent Examiner Potentate. Just a few simple questions. Are wheels obvious? How about a wheel attached to two logs (a cart)? How about fire? woven grass to catch fish in a stream? Taking some seeds from a plant and planting
873.
by RogerL 13y ago
Your front page is scant on details, and I really don't like providing both email and a password just to figure out if I should send money to somebody. You don't have a published privacy policy, which reinforces that feeling. Okay
874.
by RogerL 13y ago
If you two think so, I'd be a fool to think differently! I think people don't know how to think and evaluate. I tend to break it into Goals/strategies/tactics, though there are other useful breakdowns. I.e. start by aski
875.
by RogerL 13y ago
Yes, they are vocal about their false negatives, and they are happy with it. As long as the resumes keep flooding in, and they are hiring who they need, why do they care about rejecting qualified people, or wasting their time? OTOH, I care
876.
by RogerL 13y ago
Is there anyone that have read one of the readily available interview books that can't answer one of those estimation questions? I'm sure the answer to that question is 'yes', but I am also sure that their utter inabil
877.
by RogerL 13y ago
So, what are you measuring? I don't get it. You made offers mostly to people with few typos in their resume. Is this evidence that people with few typos are good, or evidence that you have some kind of bias against resumes with typos?
878.
by RogerL 13y ago
The whole Google (and silicon valley) interview process is a head scratcher to me. So, I'm 46 years old, kind of old compared to their usual hire. Their recruiter (they contacted me) suggested some books, and about a month's study
879.
by RogerL 13y ago
Here's the deal. Most classified information is segmented. Say I want to build a encrypting radio. I may have one team build the encrypting part, but they don't know it is for a radio. I have a second team build a radio, but they
880.
by RogerL 13y ago
UML slices code oddly. You can't fit a big system on a piece of paper. So, let's say you have a big graphics system. One of your base classes is Widget. It is almost certainly worthless to show every class that derives from Widget
881.
by RogerL 13y ago
Your profile says you have been working at a company for a year and a half, and you list no projects. Your github link contains a tic tac toe solver. You've given us nothing to judge you by. Everyone has Ruby on Rails, TDD, Agile, and