Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Rochus
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
811.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
> even if we’re in the midst of a change. What change do you refer to? Concerning C: C has obviously proven itself in countless system and embedded projects of all sizes. Nevertheless, C essentially represents the state of knowledge of
812.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
> You shouldn't be asking others to do your work for you, or to justify their choices and actions to you. Are you serious? This is HN, so it's reasonable to assume that there are people here (obviously not you) who know the p
813.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
> Comparing two different pieces of software written in the same language is sometimes exactly what you want. And here we are at my question, which obviously makes sense. So what's the difference to xv6? Why did the author conside
814.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
I asked out of interest and explained my point of view, imposing neither standards nor priorities. Why are you reacting so hostile to a question? Isn't it rather your intention to enforce your "standard" for questions and opi
815.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Unfortunately, your comment neither answers my question nor is it helpful in relation to the other arguments.
816.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Most other mentioned are also just hobby kernels; actually also Linux and BSD started that way.
817.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Same as e.g. xv6.
818.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
What's the difference to e.g. xv6? There are already so many Unix like operating systems of all sizes written in C (e.g. Minix, xv6, BSD, Darwin, Hurd, Lemon, MentOS, SanOS). If I were to go to such an effort, I would try another langu
819.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Science is not political and has never been. Unfortunately, however, scientists today all too often allow themselves to be used by the powerful for their (unscientific) purposes, or they allow themselves to be tempted by improper advantages
820.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Well, then I recommend that you invest a few more years in university level studies to understand the subject matter, and then again try to provide an efficient solution to the protein folding problem using MD. Good luck.
821.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
What is your qualification in molecular biology and/or biophysics?
822.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
What is the target use case of the library? Aren't chord, note and interval objects redundant (i.e. a chord is a set of notes of a specific distance, where the latter is an interval)? The chords themselves are just a subset of scales,
823.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Sounds interesting. Since there is already Alphafold, I would assume that your solution concentrates on Alphafold's main weakness: the restriction on cristal structures and steady state, i.e. a single structure snapshot in an unrealist
824.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
These diagrams indeed look good. But actually I never use those for parser construction, but consider EBNF more useful, especially also when analyzing and correcting a grammar. I was surprised that there was no decent editor to develop gram
825.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Very interesting. Here are the two other videos in the series: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg0mHFcB510 Polaroids showing the Evolution of the Lisa GUI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIJrCeRjZIU Bill At
826.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
That's well possible. I asked DeepSeek how I should send them feedback, and the response was: " If you’d like your feedback to be formally acknowledged or escalated (e.g., to highlight nuances about your work or correct details),
827.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Well, other scientists claim that there will be a new ice age soon in Europe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U068p4RMgew To quote Mark Twain: “Prediction is difficult, particularly when it involves the future.”
828.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
C-- is no longer actively developed or widely used. The last significant update to the C-- project was in 2004. LLVM was one of the reasons why it declined. If you're looking for an alternative to LLVM, have a look at e.g. ECMA 335 CIL
829.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
> that good compilation speed was not a design goal Not sure how this relates to my statement. I was talking about an optimizer, not about compilation speed. I'm neither using QBE, but Eigen, for good reasons.
830.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Well, if the consumer market thinks that 64 bit architectures are a core benefit (for whatever irrational reason) and are willing to pay for it, industry will/does deliver. It's still overkill for all but a few applications. But I
831.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Apparently the article doesn't help either.
832.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
To quote G.B. Shaw: " The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place "
833.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
The title statement "works toward a simplified desktop" makes the authors' focus pretty clear, so it's just fair to look for screenshots. It would be disappointing if it was just the same as GNOME.
834.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
There was a peer-reviewed paper about energy efficiency of programming languages some years ago (see https://greenlab.di.uminho.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/pap... ). A JIT seem to have little influence
835.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Is it? Python requires twenty times more computing time to solve the same problem. You could argue that there are much more browser JS users than python users. I don't have the numbers, but I guess with all the deep learning number cru
836.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Go selects with defaults don't block (unfortunately not supported by this library, but here is one which supports it: https://github.com/rochus-keller/cspchan/ ).
837.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
I wasn't aware that it is that critical. I have been doing C projects of all sizes and on different platforms and with different toolchains for forty years, including many where the same code runs on different platforms and is built wi
838.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
I didn't express a requirement for Cwerg, but just tried to explain why I prefer to implement a compiler in C++98 than C++17.
839.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
Well, for all applications which don't require to addres more than 4 GB memory, a 64 bit machine is overkill. This especially applies to embedded systems (which make up the majority of all systems). This is unlikely to change for the n
840.
▲
by
Rochus
2y ago
When refering to Pascal, I mean something like Turbo, Vax or Apple Pascal, i.e. the version used at the height of popularity. Original Pascal has much less degrees of freedom. And I have no reason to assume that Turbo or Apple Pascal have l
More ›