Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
RoboTeddy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
8y ago
When deepmind announced the project, they noted they were going to limit the machine's APM to something human-like
62.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
8y ago
Looks like yes: https://github.com/zadam/trilium/wiki/Evernote-import
63.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
8y ago
> Any attempt to solve the problem locally in a "humane" way has a high risk of just attracting more folks in the same circumstance to the area. I thought this too, but it turns out that despite San Francisco's relatively
64.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
8y ago
What's broken or unimplemented?
65.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
8y ago
This is supported for example by Richard B Lee's work ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Borshay_Lee )
66.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
8y ago
This question isn't silly! People have actually trained neural networks to generate other neural networks. The "designer" network is trained using reinforcement learning, with a reward signal that depends on the efficacy of t
67.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
IIRC from reading papers, there seems to be a dose-response effect, both w.r.t intensity and match to peak sensitive wavelength (~465nm). Even green light has some effect. Avoiding blue light at night after you go to sleep is definitely a
68.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
> we needed first to find the right sense for each word in a phrase and only then assign the vector Interesting! I wonder if you could you e.g. arbitrarily split a word into some number of symbols, e.g. two, and each time you're goi
69.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
This looks really nice! Are there any largish examples written with sweet-expressions? (Seeing large chunks of code could help with forming a gestalt impression)' Edit: found one - https://sourceforge.net/p/readabl
70.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
Looks like Mixpanel is handling this well: they deleted the data, notified affected customers, and then are making sure it can't happen again. +1 for admitting responsibility instead of deflecting or minimizing.
71.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
Would love to see some sample chat logs -- anyone know if they're available?
72.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
Altruism probably works here. It's cheap to pick a pseudorandom value. But if you didn't want to rely on altruism, the system could offer a reward to anyone who reveals the secret someone committed to early (half that provider
73.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
Actually, this kind of "snake eating its own tail" loop is exactly how cryptocurrencies operate. For example, proof of work blockchains secure themselves by creating mining incentives with money that has value because it is secure
74.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
> You also need to be sure that the others don't ignore the single altruistic source. Well sure, but the code people run listens to all the providers. Everyone is listened to automatically. That's part of the social consensus e
75.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
The system itself, e.g. the code of a smart contract. Example implementation: https://github.com/randao/randao
76.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
Can imagine a protocol for generating randomness to some arbitrary security level (at the expense of locking up security deposits): (1) Anyone can decide to become a 'randomness provider' by putting up a large security depsoit (2)
77.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
Certain kinds of misbehavior are punished. If you mine an invalid block, everyone will reject it, and you won't get any reward (you burnt electricity and hardware time for nothing). It works the same in PoS -- if you mine an invalid bl
78.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
If everyone updates, then there isn't a longstanding chain split (e.g. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident ). But yeah if there's longstanding disagreement, there are two ways for it to go: * Pe
79.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
> 2 billion US dollars is all it take to take down Bitcoin? Right -- this is one of the reasons why some people think PoS is better than PoW. Much more expensive to permanently attack in this manner. Realistically, if Bitcoin were attack
80.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
You're hitting on a critical point about cryptocurrencies that isn't widely understood yet. Ultimately, the community of users and businesses at large decides. Cryptocurrencies are social contracts that are encoded in software. If
81.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
Weird, this seems like a valuable comment. I wonder what's going on. I hope you keep commenting. Government regulation could drive Bitcoin underground inside a given country. Wouldn't be hard to imagine globalized regulation, a la
82.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
Is there any fundamental reason to measure discrepancy by abs(s - x_i)^2 rather than say by abs(s - x_i)^1.5? Is something special about 2 in this context, or is it just a social convention that seems to work pretty well?
83.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
It's great to see that organizations can receive major funding if they can provide strong evidence of efficacy! Kind of changes the landscape for people thinking of starting projects. I doubt this'll be the last nonprofit to go th
84.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
I don't see a technical advantage either. But I wouldn't say there's no advantage to users-- an ICO can let the founders (a) raise funds, and (b) give them a financial incentive for the project to succeed. So in theory, ICOs
85.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
Re: Glass: Elon Musk demonstrated that the glass is armored (it's unclear, but that might mean it just won't break under normal trucking conditions)
86.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
Yep same here. Don't reload -- I tried opening the stream in a second window, and couldn't get in at all (stuck on submitting the "watch event" form)
87.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
> Diesel mechanics tend to be ridiculously intelligent and very resourceful Cooool! Can we have a story about this?
88.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
Really interesting paper! +1 on trying to solve this problem, I was just trying to put the size of the problem in perspective (the house isn't really burning down). I suspect people underestimate the game theoretic consequences of stak
89.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
oh it's 0.1% of new payments per day. if you wanna compare it to all stored value instead (about $100bn), then the "electricity safety fee" comes out to ~0.001% per day. (these comparisons are just meant to help put the ele
90.
▲
by
RoboTeddy
9y ago
There's a reason society eventually settled on gold instead of tulips or pinecones. Good monies have certain attributes. Bitcoin's direct technological antecedent was called bitgold, and it was created by Nick Szabo who is a schol
More ›