Revanche1367

5 ms·

61.
by Revanche1367 6mo ago
The key difference (which I am sure you are aware of) is that the victims in your second scenario are foreign brown people. The comments would be very much like your first scenario if this was about Russians attacking even military targets
62.
by Revanche1367 6mo ago
That’s obvious but you seemed to be putting down foreigners for being able to stomach a million or more of them dying to protect their country from invasion unlike the enlightened democratic countries who couldn’t tolerate so many of their
63.
by Revanche1367 6mo ago
It’s easy when you worship money and consider people of other races or cultures as less than human. Not that I am advocating for this view of course but a lot of Americans do even if they won’t admit it.
64.
by Revanche1367 6mo ago
As opposed to democratic countries like the US or UK which would just lay down their arms after a few tens of thousands of their soldiers were killed in the event of a foreign military invasion on their territory?
65.
by Revanche1367 6mo ago
I feel this as a guy trying to lose weight very seriously this year. On one hand, I can lose weight but I will forever be short unless a miracle occurs lol. I’ve made my peace with being unattractive for the most part, the attempt to lose w
66.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
Or he was not comparing those two things to say they are the same thing but rather making an analogy based on the common factor of people in the US often wanting legal protections for both speech and privacy to draw his point that one is gi
67.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
At the rate things have been going, that is likely to happen in 20 days rather than 20 years.
68.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
Indeed, you’re right.
69.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
So the original blogger got slandered by an LLM agent, then got slandered again by a human journalist who used an LLM agent to write the article about him getting slandered by an LLM agent? How ironic. But, does that mean he got slandered t
70.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
I guess countless Iranians dying in the process doesn’t matter at all? As long as the Americans are killing them from far away, it’s all good?
71.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
Yes. Just because you like the saying doesn’t mean it isn’t.
72.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
Yet another very recent account on HN claiming to be Persian and speaking about things on the ground in Iran. Can’t you guys at least try a little harder to be convincing?
73.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
Not only the current administration, no US administration in the recent past or foreseeable future will not be okay with fighting wars for Israel at the cost of American lives and wealth. Some might hesitate or push back more than others, b
74.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
He did not make that claim and even said criticism of China’s abuses is warranted. Zionist shill.
75.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
And they’ve blurred it so much and thrown around the accusation so frequently and with so little hesitancy that many people are starting to simply not care anymore.
76.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
I agree about Israel fast losing support among the general public here but the idea of a less accommodating executive or legislative branch in the US for Israel is unthinkable. Not unless the system is changed from the ground up in dramatic
77.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
For a Persian you have very US republican boomer speaking patterns. And of course a very recent account.
78.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
You guys really like revising history in realtime, huh? As if we didn’t live through that era ourselves. It was never a remote secret that Israel kept pushing the US to attack Iraq and had done so for years before 9/11, which Iraq had
79.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
Pretty sure he chose his words carefully.
80.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
This was clearly a joke.
81.
by Revanche1367 7mo ago
Sport team names have nothing to do with declaring ancestry.
82.
by Revanche1367 8mo ago
I think this is based on training from sites like reddit. Highly active and pseudo-intellectual redditors have had a habit of speaking in patterns like this for many years in my experience. It is grating and I hope I never pick up the habit
83.
by Revanche1367 8mo ago
The difference is that the person who was a woodworker is no longer needed. Why can’t the customer just walk up to a kiosk and ask the machine to start building? The machine or another one specialized for QA can then assess if it fits all t
84.
by Revanche1367 8mo ago
Yeah, the thing that’s different about this technical revolution compared to the previous ones is that it’s not only trying to take out multiple industries, but the creative process as a whole.
85.
by Revanche1367 8mo ago
In my experience they can definitely write concise and reusable code. You just need to say to them “write concise and reusable code.” Works well for Codex, Claude, etc.
86.
by Revanche1367 8mo ago
I agree with this. At a higher level of abstraction, you’re still doing the fundamental problem solving. Low-level machine language or high-level Java, C++ or even Python, the fundamental algorithm design is still entirely done by the progr
87.
by Revanche1367 11mo ago
>Speak for yourself and your own use cases Take your own advice.
88.
by Revanche1367 1y ago
Ironically, his parents didn’t do a good enough job of passing on the shared history, values, and national culture of the US.
89.
by Revanche1367 2y ago
Majority of Americans do not care, unlike what always online political social media wants you to believe. It’s not really a big concern for us what is going on in Europe and frankly I prefer that the US does not meddle in foreign affairs, t