Reubachi

27 ms·

301.
by Reubachi 5y ago
Can't believe this sentiment is somehow popular. See: Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Palestine, Bosnia etc. Your described solution will ensure just as much war/suffering as a direct involvement plan would. let's be honest: no combi
302.
by Reubachi 5y ago
I can't be the only one who's nonplussed by this sites lack of certificate? Not a lack of a publicly trusted certificate...but a lack of any certificate whatsoever. Am I missing something about his legacy, perhaps not trusting CA
303.
by Reubachi 5y ago
Ah, the Jagex method.
304.
by Reubachi 5y ago
Every windows PC, every android, and even things like Pi OS/linux kernel can push to multiple distinct bluetooth targets simultaneously. For android I think it's going on 7 years of that
305.
by Reubachi 5y ago
Ask yourself: Are WE able to see the continental structure of an exoplanet millions of light years away with our current telescopes/imaging software?
306.
by Reubachi 5y ago
A thoughtful cause with a well thought out landing page to grab the eye. Unfortunately,every link on that page to support them 404s.
307.
by Reubachi 5y ago
Well, we now know it won't be the "commercial manager" or whoever that gets the axe, rather an IT Admin.
308.
by Reubachi 5y ago
I'm a layman in availability and how your service relies upon it, But how can your engagement from clients be "the same", despite half the availability? Does this imply that all else perfect andavailable,every day, you could
309.
by Reubachi 5y ago
Originally, you did not need a facebook account to use oculus after purchase. They framed this as "you do not need to integrate social media/facebook". This ^ means fuck-all, because at that time (day 1), their oculus service
310.
by Reubachi 5y ago
Yep. We've come full circle, where techies are rediscovering the original hatred for the Oculus, that it is tied to a social media walled garden, for some reason.
311.
by Reubachi 5y ago
It's not illegal by any means, it's ability to be enforced is questionable though given precedent. Look at any tech firm with CEOs whom used to be with their firm's competitor; That's a large chunk of chief legal officer
312.
by Reubachi 5y ago
because that is an open source initiative(they can't exxacerbate development costs, and because it would be a barrier of adoption to their target base: rich, "eco" conscious people.
313.
by Reubachi 5y ago
Software, batteries, and the bluetooth comm protocol are three giant points of failure. An example, I can no longer use my car's (2012) bluetooth with any modern device. At least, it is horribally laggy and doesn't display data, w
314.
by Reubachi 5y ago
"BT headphones are much more reliable. If you buy something like the Sony's you can probably get replacement batteries." I don't think I've read many comments as airy as this one. You can't get replacement batt
315.
by Reubachi 5y ago
Do you know anything about the company behind fairphone? The top voted comments criticizing them all have clearly valid claims. it does not matter if the "ethical" product is good if the company behind them isn't ethical.
316.
by Reubachi 5y ago
The parent comment was "Why are koalas nasty"? Their answer was "Koalas have chlamydia." How does this not add to the discussion? And this doesn't need a source, that fact is well understood but not obvious to every
317.
by Reubachi 5y ago
(late reply) I can accept that he really likes the product, but even then, the point of the article is broken.I cannot imagine any scenario in which a professional photographer would use a mobile device for legitimate client work, unless h
318.
by Reubachi 5y ago
But professional photographers who spend as much time editing as photographing won't be purchasing this phone with that intention. That would be lunacy, as their profession/hobby likely already has had them invest thousands into p
319.
by Reubachi 5y ago
yes....that's what's crazy: why? Not sure the why folks are confused about folks being confused about this. There must be some logical reason they would pay out close to 50x the demanded payout, but none of us for the life of us c
320.
by Reubachi 5y ago
I don't think it's harsh, as those points to me aren't valid. I'd much rather have the Mozilla foundation focus on security, privacy, ubiquity than UX and less used features like history searching. That said, I can'
321.
by Reubachi 5y ago
I think your thoughts speak to how public services operate in US verus other western countries. In the US, such a process would (in my naive understanding)cripple my small-mid sized coastal towns FD, and throw the town leadership into a hea
322.
by Reubachi 5y ago
my one gripe, if it can be called a gripe, is that the episodes are more often than not hard to follow due to the complex topic/length. Looking thru the feed, 8/10 of the recent casts I've listened to are only about 1/4
323.
by Reubachi 5y ago
but...in a perfect world this isn't a question, "Will my employer tolerate my sexuality at work". Do you have to hide being straight at work? If so, I don't think we have the same idea of what work is. (the royal you, no
324.
by Reubachi 5y ago
If our two gut biomes where examined by the same gastroenterologist, they might say mine is more bacterially mono-cultured and yours is more cultured. Who's to say that's bad? An experiment that isn't reasonable: Go to a Gast
325.
by Reubachi 5y ago
Weird this needs to be reiterated in Covid 2021....What do you think "media" should be doing? Remember, media =/= op-ed journalists that you want to have the same opinion as you. "media" should not have to do anythi
326.
by Reubachi 5y ago
I don't understand this. Why would mcdonald's take a bid from a company saying, essentially: "Our package includes unnecessary maintenance costs and ill-perceived customer opinions of service. But we will pay you for that, a
327.
by Reubachi 5y ago
Uh..Look up food quality in antiquity. Food born illnesses (e.coli, salmonella, norovirus) have ravaged societies for hundreds of years. only very recently in the west have we been able to say "this food sucks" because of our opin
328.
by Reubachi 5y ago
I can't think of any fuel source that will satisfy virtually all energy use cases with so little risk as nuclear batterization, even when considering the potential ability to lose the knowledge of how to maintain them given a total soc
329.
by Reubachi 6y ago
I admire your problem solving ideas, but engineering this to a point that is 1. effective at mutually/exclusively recycling two sets of air and 2. cost effective is impossible. Would be akin to putting twin turbochargers in a cheap car
330.
by Reubachi 7y ago
HOLY MOLY NSFW tag, my friend.

More ›