RedComet

15 ms·

151.
by RedComet 6y ago
"Shut it down."
152.
by RedComet 6y ago
It sounds good in theory, but it just isn't true. Mozilla is null factor these days, and most of their income has actually been from Google. Google is most likely keeping them afloat just to ward off a stray monopoly charge at this poi
153.
by RedComet 6y ago
One and the same. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Hebrew_Israelites
154.
by RedComet 6y ago
It seems pretty clear that the only people he was both interested in pardoning and didn't know personally belong to a particular ethnic group that those two don't.
155.
by RedComet 6y ago
Pasty? Why the racism?
156.
by RedComet 6y ago
Yeah, sounds cool. That way ma & pa lose their patent right away and Google keeps it forever.
157.
by RedComet 6y ago
You're not allowed to mention that, we have to pretend it's a charity.
158.
by RedComet 6y ago
Jesse, what the fuck are you talking about?
159.
by RedComet 6y ago
It means it's not okay to write poor-me post pretending you're some regular person who's sacrificing a pay check to work on a project simply because it's the right thing to do. Life is full of "meanies". Cry me
160.
by RedComet 6y ago
Let's not pretend this just some guy's hobby project. They've received millions of dollars in funding, more than many small businesses make a year.
161.
by RedComet 6y ago
Cyberpunk 2021 but instead of getting leg modifications to jump over buildings, you're stuck in your home wearing a surgical mask and only allowed to watch corporate approved news.
162.
by RedComet 6y ago
The cyberpunk future is here - a giant corporation that doesn't even make money is censoring the sitting president. All we can do is laugh.
163.
by RedComet 6y ago
Why? Haven't you seen all of the videos of people being arrested for it? Would you have liked it better if I said "speeding tickets". Fine, speeding tickets. Yet KNOWN peddlers of child porn rake in cash like most people can&
164.
by RedComet 6y ago
But they still made money on videos with underage runaways for years, right? Is law enforcement going to do anything about this or do they only arrest people for not wearing masks, now?
165.
by RedComet 6y ago
Very good. Hopefully the wicked people that run the website are arrested next.
166.
by RedComet 6y ago
About time.
167.
by RedComet 6y ago
Is there anyone that doesn't see what's going on at this point?
168.
by RedComet 6y ago
How about a simple cap on "interest"? Far easier to implement, far more practical, far more beneficial.
169.
by RedComet 6y ago
Yeah, the latest Android TV (Sony) update has ads at the top of the screen that you can't disable.
170.
by RedComet 6y ago
But how would they track everything you watch on it then? Can't have you throwing a Heat (1995) DVD without it being recorded in a database, can we? Sure, your smartphone probably pics up the audio, but it may just report that you&#x27
171.
by RedComet 6y ago
Dispicable. Attacking the middle-to-lower class, like usual. Do you think this will affect the wealthy negatively? Not one will notice.
172.
by RedComet 6y ago
Fallout 4 and the latest Modern Warfare beg to differ (with the first point).
173.
by RedComet 6y ago
"wins"
174.
by RedComet 6y ago
Thank you, I have only noticed this occurring after clicking a different video first. It is probably due click highjacking or the like.
175.
by RedComet 6y ago
Same, is there a fix for this?
176.
by RedComet 6y ago
What the... your replies are becoming more and more unintelligible each time, just gibberish interspersed with words I used earlier in the conversation. Am I talking to a neural network?
177.
by RedComet 6y ago
Google became a multi-billion dollar international corporation hosting the same content you advocate against, whether through search results or youtube directly. And now that they have the money and the power, they're crushing all diss
178.
by RedComet 6y ago
1. You repeat the title, saying google banned a third party app for bitchute, but adding words with a negative connotation. (while openly advocating for censorship and jailing people you disagree with) 2. I note that this is hypocritical an
179.
by RedComet 6y ago
Are you trolling? Your original response did NOT address anything I said. My initial comment IS pertinent to the original post - I succinctly pointed out a great deal of things: The irony of Google banning such and app, the blatant suppres
180.
by RedComet 6y ago
That has nothing to do with my original comment.

More ›