Ray20

11 ms·

181.
by Ray20 1y ago
> doesn’t have the same benefits to society at large. The benefits to society will be larger. Just think about it: when you replace a dirty dangerous jobs, the workers simply have nowhere to go, and they begin to generate losses for soci
182.
by Ray20 1y ago
I mean, yes. The invention of AI that replaces virtually all workers would certainly pose a serious challenge to society. But that's nothing compared to what would happen if Jesus descended from the sky and turned off gravity for the e
183.
by Ray20 1y ago
Because we invent machines not to free ourselves from labor (inventing machines is a huge amount of labor by itself), but to overcome the greed of the workers.
184.
by Ray20 1y ago
Hasn't every such technological development been accompanied by opponents of its implementation? At least now, things aren't so bad, and today's Luddites aren't trashing offices of ai-companies and hanging their employee
185.
by Ray20 1y ago
> I thought the Republicans were the party for rich? Isn't it the other way around? I mean, in the Internet, it's the democratic side that's constantly complaining about how stupid, uneducated rednecks elected dictator Tru
186.
by Ray20 1y ago
>It is not possible to censor the internet when VPNs are freely available. What's stopping VPN providers from being forced to censor the internet?
187.
by Ray20 1y ago
Obviously, yes. A crime is a crime, so what difference does it make what country it was committed in?
188.
by Ray20 1y ago
At the moment, the US looks much more democratic and liberal than the EU.
189.
by Ray20 1y ago
Yeah, shure. Germany, which started WW2, and France, which collapsed and capitulated less than a year later. There have been no wars in Europe for 75 years because for those 75 years the United States single-handedly decided with whom Europ
190.
by Ray20 1y ago
In reality, this isn't a very serious threat. Rather, we're concerned about AI as a tool for strengthening totalitarian regimes.
191.
by Ray20 1y ago
> WW2 was so horrific that Europeans were willing to do anything to prevent it again But this is total childish nonsense. We gained 75 years of peace in Europe not because the war was terrible, but because the entire world was divided be
192.
by Ray20 1y ago
> He believed in a universal basic income (Agrarian Justice) I am, of course, only superficially familiar with his works, but calling what Paine proposed a basic income is extremely stupid. This is a trivial concept of viewing territorie
193.
by Ray20 1y ago
What's illegal? Changing prices? Giving discounts? As I understand it, the EU, as always, is using solutions to problems that are worse than the problems themselves. And so, instead of a situation where the price, taking into account t
194.
by Ray20 1y ago
> doesn't move the situation any closer to liberation of their people and their homeland. From Hamas?
195.
by Ray20 1y ago
> It's not like the Gazans have any money to speak of. This is more of an argument in favor of the other side. It immediately becomes clear why they don't have the money.
196.
by Ray20 1y ago
> You’d prefer that the owner of a UK pro-LGBT site could be extradited to Uganda over some anti-gay law? Should BBC reporters be sent to the gulag for writing an unfavorable article about Russia? Indeed, a good argument against globaliz
197.
by Ray20 1y ago
> why would I be subject to their laws? For the same reason that a person under British jurisdiction is subject to its laws. I mean, laws, including British ones, exist for a reason. And usually, that reason isn't "because they
198.
by Ray20 1y ago
> Just because some UK user might visit my website doesn't mean I now have to follow all UK laws if I don't actually do business there That's exactly what it means. On what basis should you be allowed to violate British la
199.
by Ray20 1y ago
> as some sort of defense of the (otherwise) indefensible Trying to dispute this fact reveals your inexperience and out-of-touch worldviews. And frankly, I'm not entirely understand what you think this fact is defending. > The fu
200.
by Ray20 1y ago
> 100 years ago people said electricity would be more efficient than humans in every single aspect? Yes, literally.
201.
by Ray20 1y ago
> What alternatives would be more fair, from your perspective? It would be more fair for the Americans to first return to Europe and only then voice their valuable opinions about fairness.
202.
by Ray20 1y ago
>In a post-scarcity society Human needs unlimited. There can't be any "post-scarcity society". The transition point to a post-scarcity society is in the eyes of the beholder, and moves away from them at the same speed with
203.
by Ray20 1y ago
It's funny that just over 100 years ago, they were saying EXACTLY the same thing about electricity. Ultimately, history has shown all the reasons to to keep a capitalism society.
204.
by Ray20 1y ago
How does the occurring of AGI lead to the need for UBI?
205.
by Ray20 1y ago
> outside of something like what's currently happening in Ukraine. Typical slippery slope. "The problem comes in because military force is never the complete solution in and of itself outside of something like <insert any us
206.
by Ray20 1y ago
> It is still a good idea to censor the people in category two. I mean how can you censor the WHO? > WHO initially got wrong But they don't got something wrong, they, as you put it, were "bullshitting", and it was obvio
207.
by Ray20 1y ago
Why would they go there? Well, except in situations where they're not needed in America due to a lack of talent? People don't go to America because the American president is a charming and polite gentleman. They go there because a
208.
by Ray20 1y ago
Who cares what people asking? America's reputation has long been built on the fact that America has the largest economy, the largest army, and does whatever the f.сk it wants.
209.
by Ray20 1y ago
Because Ukrainians do not hold Muslim terrorist views?
210.
by Ray20 1y ago
A good policy of enlightening all the fools who imagined that some kind of "free world" exists.

More ›