RattleyCooper

11 ms·

61.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
Lol, I'm not saying pilots CAN'T operate without GPS (I fly hang gliders and I used to fly with literally no instruments at all). Think of it this way. A person can live a normal life with 1 arm, 1 leg or even 1 eye or ear. Is i
62.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
As cool as some of these cyberdecks are I can't help but find it hilarious that people are shoving RPIs into pelican cases.. It'd be way cooler to have this kind of tool built to look like a regular household item... Like have it
63.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
You miss the point entirely. No commercial aircraft is going to be allowed to take off with only 1/2 engines in operation. If one goes out in flight they'll usually find a place to land bc it's understood that if that last
64.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
Would you be ok with a commercial passenger flight operating with 1 of the 2 engines completely disabled? It's technically designed to fly with 1 engine, so what's the problem? Knocking out a pilot's GPS gives them one less
65.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
I mean, the article is very clear that it's on-site management that are not allowing controllers to do their job; nowhere in the article do they suggest that the US Army doesn't take it seriously.
66.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
Karl Marx was a twat waffle
67.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
For 3 months, uninterrupted? Yeah, I don't think that's reasonable at all.
68.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
You can blame the driver but if tesla calls their systems "auto-pilot" or "full self-driving" mode then they're creating expectations in people's minds that they aren't going to be kamikaze'd into a c
69.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
What, are they going to monitor employees and search through their medicine cabinets? I mean ffs nobody even needs a religious exemption bc nobody has a right to force someone to inject anything into their body, especially through coercive
70.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
Yeah but requiring school does nothing to prevent abuse. For instance, Kim Jong Un went to university. Just because people gatekeep knowledge, that doesn't automatically mean only good people will get access to it. It actually means
71.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
>And the whole "believe science" thing? I’m sorry, it’s complete bullshit. Science is not something to be believed or trusted. Trust is antithetical to science. Show me the data, and let me decide for myself. This 1000 times.
72.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
Woooowwwww, I went to their website and scrolled down and of course they're bragging about them donating to cancer research . Oof...
73.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
>The slippery slope fallacy is exactly that: a fallacy. The slippery slope fallacy is only a fallacy when there is no prior evidence of said thing happening in the past. People who parrot "slippery slope is a fallacy", like in
74.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
Sinophobic? How? I took it as a matter-of-fact statement, not some kind of fearful revelation or any kind of fear-mongering.
75.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
>What? I can’t call someone a “f** f*” anymore? If this is what you honestly think they're referring to then I feel like that says a LOT more about you then it does about them. They were very clear that they aren't talking abo
76.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
The "you didn't mean to hit someone with your car" thing is certainly a fun way to look at it, but what about people only get tapped by the bumper and then act like they flipped through the air 500 times before slamming their
77.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
>If you tolerate intolerance (regardless of intent) So should people tolerate people who don't tolerate the intolerant? And should other people tolerate them? I feel like Mr. Garrison's take on it sums it up really well. Tole
78.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
It depends on the content. The flip side is looking up a programming-related question and getting results from 2012. I think they take different things into account based on the thing being searched.
79.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
Can you back your remarks up with references to prove your statements, about references being suitable proof for a statement, as being accurate?
80.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
Yeah
81.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
Ffs 2 of my all time favorite comedians gone in less than a couple months..
82.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
That should help the climate crisis by roughly 40%
83.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
The idea of a social construct is just a social construct man
84.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
>Why is anyone seriously talking about Ivermectin Probably because Ivermectin has gone through the rigorous process of testing/approval required for use in humans, that we haven't had time to do with the vaccine. I mean, it&#x
85.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
And animals, in general, account for nearly 100% of all greenhouse gas emissions, so if we kill absolutely everything on the planet we can save the planet!
86.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
Germany claims they only used it on terrorists and organized crime members... I feel like one of the main issues is people still remember that thing Germany did way back when when they considered all Jews to be terrorists...
87.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
If I knew anybody at NSO Group I'd start messaging them unsolicited PDFs and shit :P
88.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
>This is a classic demonstration that "slippery slope" isn't a fallacy. What's ironic is that people who usually call out slippery slope as being a fallacy are participating in the fallacy of cherry-picking. Because
89.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
I actually wrote a small program for batch scaling images using pixie a couple weeks ago and it was a bit faster than ImageMagick, and the results looked the same. The scaling in pixie is a little less flexible though. I haven't reall
90.
by RattleyCooper 5y ago
I don't think treeform and guzba will have much trouble, honestly.

More ›