Rapzid

24 ms·

451.
by Rapzid 3y ago
Hasn't FireFox been dragging their asses on @scope? https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/472 It took years to just convince them of the need for it. And I'm not sure anyone got conv
452.
by Rapzid 3y ago
> Not having to come up with names for CSS classes As soon as you want theming you'll need to start naming stuff. And if you want that theming to support third-party CSS overrides, or need good CSS selector support, you're goin
453.
by Rapzid 3y ago
Button.css I find it's often easier/cleaner to just pop a CSS file in for some of these foundational components that have tons of variations. Can use nested CSS now, and the selectors are easier to to work with IMHO and ta
454.
by Rapzid 3y ago
Book barely talks about tools. It wasn't about tools. The epiphany for many was the concept of an error budget and establishing SLOs. Then, basing investment in reliability on data. That's as applicable today as it was then.
455.
by Rapzid 3y ago
That's a very sexist take. We should support working fathers allow them to take years off work with no consequences.
456.
by Rapzid 3y ago
The front half is for introducing ideas. The back chapters where never that great IMHO. They get both too in the weeds and at the same time missing actionable advice.
457.
by Rapzid 3y ago
How has it advanced greatly since then?
458.
by Rapzid 3y ago
The other books.
459.
by Rapzid 3y ago
In the referenced case a management company was pressuring/forcing participants to go with the recommended prices.
460.
by Rapzid 3y ago
That's most people's web 3.0 experience lol.
461.
by Rapzid 3y ago
That's an interesting dynamic at play. I'm sure regulators around the world are working around the clock on figuring out how to deal with AirBnb lol.
462.
by Rapzid 3y ago
> some pricing discretion That's the key. The problem is the agreement; that results in price fixing. Even if someone is allowed "some pricing discretion"(ie maybe they can deviate 8%) it can still be illegal. Maintaining
463.
by Rapzid 3y ago
Ahh, this is the missing context! The collusion is the agreement to adhere to the pricing set by a central pricing authority, not basing your prices off shared information or recommendations. This makes a lot of sense now. Edit: Well maybe
464.
by Rapzid 3y ago
The motorcycle safety courses teaches NOT to assume a driver sees or will yield the right away because of "eye contact".
465.
by Rapzid 3y ago
It's a brave new world.
466.
by Rapzid 3y ago
Enums suck in a bunch of languages including C#. It has binary compatibility issues that need consideration along with some other gotchas and shortcomings. So much so that much of the dotnet official stuff, ie asp.net, use static classes wi
467.
by Rapzid 3y ago
The "stone skip" or "deflection" theory of lift is not accurate; https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/VirtualAero/BottleRocket/a... Planes fly through gas, not solid particulate. Gas has
468.
by Rapzid 3y ago
You can also reuse containers with test containers. Now the next question might be "Well why use test containers then if you are reusing containers". Because you can express these dependencies and drive the config programmatically
469.
by Rapzid 3y ago
IDK man, what I said was correct; it's wrong. GLHF.
470.
by Rapzid 3y ago
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/VirtualAero/BottleRocket/a...
471.
by Rapzid 3y ago
It's wrong though. A large, hypothetical scale under the plane would not register the weight of the plane as it flies over. And not just because diffusion but that being one of many reasons.
472.
by Rapzid 3y ago
> If one were to build a large scale on the ground, as an airplane flies over it, the scale would register the weight of the airplane No, it wouldn't. I think the article does a pretty good job building a more complete understanding
473.
by Rapzid 3y ago
Can you elaborate on this? React's in-built reactivity system via props and context are certainly push. I'm not even aware of a pull-based reactivity system.
474.
by Rapzid 3y ago
Yeah, it's bizarre how it's essentially been doing what all these newish(past 4 years or so) state management libraries and frameworks are rediscovering the entire time and yet.. It gets snubbed. Not even mentioned as a state mana
475.
by Rapzid 3y ago
What did you move to? I've seen plenty of spaghetti code with just about every other React state management (reactivity) approach. The benefit of MobX to me is I can write a more traditional "domain" layer and wire the view i
476.
by Rapzid 3y ago
MobX and chill. No compiler necessary. If React created better extension points for pluggable reactivity we wouldn't even need observer() wrappers. This is all getting kinda bonkers.
477.
by Rapzid 3y ago
They are going to need to use the stick with Apple for sure. But they'd be better off fining Apple come to Jesus money. A figure so astronomical the board considers firing Tim Cook and Apple considers abandoning the EU market on their
478.
by Rapzid 3y ago
The Reddit sub blackouts really caught me off guard. Made me reflect on how crazy it is that a substantial portion of public knowledge and discourse over the past decade has occurred there. And this information is locked up under the contro
479.
by Rapzid 3y ago
I couldn't understand why Google was launching a Dart startup.
480.
by Rapzid 3y ago
You're Roku TCL may be a POC, but TCL puts out televisions that are at the forefront of LCD/LED TV technology. Very happy with my 55R655.

More ›