RandomLensman

5 ms·

61.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Humans can and have been directed en masses by (what I would consider) malicious actors, too. The issue isn't new.
62.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Which is why with organic intelligence we (sometimes) limit what they can actually do instead of relying on alignment. Can do the same here.
63.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
What "own objectives"? Isn't it more that specifying objectives is hard (AI or organic) and typically supplement them by boxing things in (again, AI or organic).
64.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Why should the agents consider it a prisoners delimma to start with? Why would they consider the communication risky? Where they given a reward functions that way? Given how unexpected and complex behavior can come from simple reward functi
65.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
I see. I would have thought of "rogue" here to mean something more like that the AI selects and acts on its own objectives that are not related or caused by the given (initial) objectives (e.g., creating only cookie recipes instea
66.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
How would that be rogue?
67.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Why is it not an example of tacit or autonomous algorithmic collusion? The agents were started with something as task at some point, I presume (if untasked, aren't they just accepting a task?)
68.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Reward hacking/going for unanticipated solutions is nothing new in ML/AI, already much simpler systems have done/do "weird" things (gut feeling is that iterative and ensemble use majes the surface for that much larg
69.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Why woukd they? Was that part of their objective? What was there to whistle blow?
70.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Continuously exercised and on everything as a matter of course? Not all is done via direct democracy there (even though it is the ultimate backstop in a way), it also has representative democracy.
71.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Who is the leadership? The Council - then it would be national elections etc for the individual national representatives; the Commission - then it would be the European Parliament.
72.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Has such a system ever existed anywhere? How would citizens even have the time?
73.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
I think being smart and attentive means noticing a lot of poor craftsmanship (broadest sense, in a lot of areas from politics to whatever) and understanding why that can be sort of a stable situation with little chance of changing, so need
74.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
My time proving things is long in the past and any systems way back when I was studying (some math among other things) certainly were different and usually quite narrow. My point was rather more motivated by having seen so many weird ways f
75.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Doesn't Lean also have libraries? Anyway, there could also be hardware errors, I suppose.
76.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
If the proof is formally verified but impossible to understand how would anyone be able to be sure the formal verification is correct? Complex software is bound to have bugs, no?
77.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Speculative whether it could be done with humans without severe side effects that would make it useless/pointless. Is it a product available to humans at all?
78.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
This sounds highly speculative then, i.e., the biology could never work out, no?
79.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
How would you address the non-interchangeable nature of synonymous codons? Do we know the right replacements?
80.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
What's an example of a government adjacent company? And was that in a civil law country?
81.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
I think you need to be more precise then on what you mean by "law" and differentiate there and also by what authorises that.
82.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
1) Laws need parliament, no? Just agreeing to it isn't necessarily enough at least in some countries. 2) What laws and sections specifically makes that possible? Are there examples of that happening? 3) Where can I find that interpreta
83.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
There is already (partial) automation there, for example for finding new drug candidates. Isn't that so far only static folding?
84.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
1) Would that fine print be binding? 2) What actual law/regulation would that currently be that would be used for such an outright refusal? 3) Would that comply with current regulation?
85.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
>The watermarking algorithm itself has a VERY specific property that should have set off everyone's alarm bells: it is NOT the case that you can "check text for AI watermark". What it technically mandates is that if you pr
86.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Being a major importers of olive oil is probably not such a big deal. The EU is pretty self-sufficient for food, for example - can change a bit the food and agg mix if needed (and some countries have emergency stores as well).
87.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
Shouldn't it be the users that need to do any RoI measurements? Not sure you'll get detailed data from them easily.
88.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
What is difficult about measuring RoI? Time scales?
89.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
JD Rockefeller actually went to a public school (in the US, not UK meaning).
90.
by RandomLensman 1mo ago
There is no serious talk on the IMF taking control of French public finances. The spread between France OAT and German Bunds is less than 100bps. The French annual budget deficit is lower than the projected US one.

More ›