Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
RRRA
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
211.
▲
by
RRRA
12y ago
My impression was that recently Go had fallen too... http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2014/03/the-e...
212.
▲
by
RRRA
12y ago
By client side encryption you mean you can use a friend you don't have to trust as a cross-backup system? Also, anyone know how they compare? :) EDIT: Login Log <- none for the free version?
213.
▲
by
RRRA
12y ago
Cryptographic algorithm usually are pretty straight forward when you look at them. Beside good verifiable coding practice to have a quality implementation, it seems that the issue is with the many side channels attack that needs to be obfus
214.
▲
by
RRRA
12y ago
It was even more practical before the web server when you could just do: finger @bathroom.mit.edu (it was still active a few months ago, what's going on! :)
215.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Most coders I see would be useless as sysadmins...
216.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
I'd love to see John Perry Barlow... :)
217.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2014/04/10/debunked_fran...
218.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Awesome! But the secret passages do not appear to be there... :P
219.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
A pluginless distributed P2P over WebRTC would be interesting! The whole trust could be built client side and the servers used only for handshaking clients. We could then imagine clients that are aware of multiple servers and distribute bo
220.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Rather it's the day I stop cheering for VR, again... back to the 90s!
221.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
So now we should rate up everyone so they reach 1k karma?
222.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Yeah, what's up with that?! Is this Air force News now? :P
223.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Now let's talk about how we are supposed to sign webApps in a way similaire to debian package distribution as to be able to actually trust one you d/l online and be able to trace the update you might receive by revisiting the page
224.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
So is there a way to use any of those devices coming out (including health monitoring!) without leaking everything to the cloud? I'm getting really annoyed that none of those will actually give you the tools to dump your data yourself
225.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Choppy water is hard to meditate to ;)
226.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Flash is such an ecosystem...
227.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Free as in beer, not as in free speech and still complete format lock in?
228.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
I see he was not alone! But it was more likely in the past 10 days or so... :)
229.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
So, who the other day said they would be buying if BTC felt bellow 500$? Now seems to be the time if they still believe that arbitrary value still makes sense.
230.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
It'll be interesting to see if Silk Road 2 will be able to recover from their loss by creating a truly (crypto) trustable escrow service that can be reused by exchange... I don't understand how you can trust any exchange otherwise
231.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Haven't they shot themselves (and everyone else!) in the foot?
232.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Murder... http://videos.lexpress.fr/actualite/monde/video-ukraine-des-...
233.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
With all this discussion about SPA websites: Is anyone aware of a solution to allow clients to validate a version of an SPA website (cryptographically), in the sense that once downloaded a signature is checked and then further visit, if the
234.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Well if it's that obvious it probably means that people who could easily simplify the process are too busy playing casino instead? :)
235.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
If BTC drops, below 500 or less, why exactly 500? Why not wait for 400? I'm new to this but maybe we need to make it easier to move money from wallet to wallet, from wallet to "hard" currencies and back, etc. Right now it
236.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
I'm surprised most people were not wondering why the McDonald of coffee was this popular anyway... Maybe this'll make them go to their local coffee shop instead, dumb or not! ;-)
237.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
So long for people in danger, in need of health information, that are LGBT and need support, etc... How can such a troll article get so high?!
238.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Good point, I guess I'm still new to this, I just bought some BTC from the new Montreal's ATM yesterday. I guess that by blacking out the time or part of the amount I would have made it "uncertain"... So yeah, point is,
239.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Well, it seems the experiment is over and they tried to pay back everyone, but have a look at my wallet: http://imgur.com/10nx0DG I sent 0.0012408 + 0.0001 fee and got 0.1199 back... So I just tried again before seeing that
240.
▲
by
RRRA
13y ago
Can anybody tell me how you come I've sent close to the minimum and got almost 100 time more? (this is not a joke, algo. fail?)
More ›