RIMR

8 ms·

121.
by RIMR 6mo ago
Look, I get that you are approaching this in good faith, assuming that they cut these specialists because it was redundant and inefficient. If this were 10 years ago, this would be an understandable assumption, but today there is absolutely
122.
by RIMR 6mo ago
My only actual use of image or video AI tools is self-entertainment. I like to give it prompts and see the results it gives me. That's it. I can't think of a single actual use case outside of this that isn't deliberately mani
123.
by RIMR 6mo ago
That's probably because: A. Our tactics would constitute an invasion B. We would try to seize oil or other natural resources while we were there. C. The president would literally say something like this on national television.
124.
by RIMR 6mo ago
There's a world of difference between software dependencies going out of date between many releases and a company deliberately disabling older devices from downloading static ebook files instead of maintaining some sort of basic backwa
125.
by RIMR 6mo ago
It's more a matter that managing an X account reads as an endorsement of the platform, and endorsing X is a major brand risk for the EFF. Those 100k people aren't worth it.
126.
by RIMR 6mo ago
> Yes, it denies simple P2P connectivity. World doesn't need it. Worth pointing out that this article was written by the now-CEO of Tailscale. I don't know if "The world doesn't need P2P connectivity" is a compel
127.
by RIMR 6mo ago
Given what we're facing, I am actually skeptical of people who step up to work for the government at this moment in time. There's a lot of nationalist language on this site. Even if your motivations are for science, do we really w
128.
by RIMR 6mo ago
I mean, I can make sense of it, but it's written like it's describing a picture or something. As a standalone sentence, it is weird.
129.
by RIMR 6mo ago
Weird to assume that anyone is more upset with Google than ICE about this when nobody said anything to that effect. Weird to decide that you have to choose to be mad at one party or the other, and that getting mad at one party somehow indic
130.
by RIMR 6mo ago
Donating ill-gotten gains does not legitimize them. This isn't a confusing concept... Also, it's cryptocurrency. There is literally no burden to prove that this money was donated, or what "charity" even means in this con
131.
by RIMR 6mo ago
Even if that's the case, why not just cut the mic and have security escort him away? Why jump straight to sending the cops to arrest and jail him? It's abundantly clear that these things happen not because people were so disruptiv
132.
by RIMR 6mo ago
This is how authoritarians speak. Rules only matter when they make sense. An authoritarian never cares about that, and insists on a strict interpretation of the rules, well beyond reason. A 3-minute limit is sensible. Hauling someone off to
133.
by RIMR 6mo ago
Look, the article is right there, and what it says doesn't match what you're saying. Sure, they arrested him for "trespassing", but their definition of trespassing was going over his allotted time by a matter of seconds.
134.
by RIMR 6mo ago
There's usually a two-second delay between a light turning red and the next light turning green, just as a simple safety precaution. No driver is perfect, and red lights get run through accidentally all the time. While running the red
135.
by RIMR 6mo ago
I don't own a car, but I still walk on the sidewalks, and these cameras can still see my face. Or do I also need to accept the reduced privacy imposed on motorists when I step outside my front door facing a road?
136.
by RIMR 6mo ago
Why would child pornography laws have anything to do with someone pretending to be under-18? That's distasteful, sure, but objectively, people over-18 are not children. Basic recordkeeping laws should make it easy to ensure that everyo
137.
by RIMR 6mo ago
No, but if those VCs let their AI agents purchase things on their behalf, you could maybe trick those agents into thinking your cloud service was the better option.
138.
by RIMR 6mo ago
I urge you to actually read the article, because it doesn't say anything about the risks of the LLM knowing your password (e.g., stored in server-side logs), it talks about LLMs generating predicatable passwords because they are determ
139.
by RIMR 6mo ago
I mean, people are still rotating <month><year> passwords because they refuse to remember anything. I only know this, because I am in a customer-facing position, and these customers rarely care about revealing their passwords wh
140.
by RIMR 6mo ago
That is interesting data. Just from looking at those graphs, it looks like AIs are consistently avoidant of the number 69, likely because of safeguards to prevent it from being offensive. Otherwise its training would probably tell it that i
141.
by RIMR 6mo ago
I read the FAQ, and I can't imagine this is going to work the way you want it to. It fundamentally doesn't make sense as a business model. I can sign up for a cohort today, but there's not even a hint of how long it will take
142.
by RIMR 6mo ago
Anthropic isn't "fighting" OpenClaw. They just want OpenClaw users to switch to API pricing so that their service doesn't become a blackhole for investor money. Operating at a loss can be strategic, but they had to caref
143.
by RIMR 6mo ago
>it's difficult for me to understand the outrage. It's pretty simple. Compliance is legally important, and faking compliance exposes companies to extraordinary legal liability. Being lied to about your compliance warrants outra
144.
by RIMR 6mo ago
YC is run by these kinds of careless people, so in a literal sense it probably isn't allowed, but we should say it anyway: FUCK META
145.
by RIMR 6mo ago
It should not be legal to enforce this kind of thing 9 years after a person leaves your company. I get that it currently is legal, but have some principles. Just because this is legal doesn't mean it isn't morally reprehensible, a
146.
by RIMR 6mo ago
I mean, a reasonable non-disparagement clause for your current employees makes sense. You don't want your employees actively undermining the company in public. If they don't believe in what you're doing, they should be able t
147.
by RIMR 6mo ago
You are still misunderstanding. If you max out your token limits, you are costing Anthropic more than you are paying them. They only expect a small percentage of their users to do this, but OpenClaw changed the dynamic. Anthropic knows that
148.
by RIMR 6mo ago
I didn't even realize you could connect a standard subscription to OpenClaw in the first place. It seems like you would run into limits rather quickly, which would degrade the experience quite badly. Anthropic's current business m
149.
by RIMR 6mo ago
I give it monumental tasks. For example, I will write massive markdown files describing all the features I want to see in an application, and I will use a standard AI chatbot to check my work and consider additional details. Finally, when I
150.
by RIMR 6mo ago
Just a heads up that everyone can still see the comment you made on your profile because it wasn't removed by moderator action. It was downvoted to oblivion because it was an attack on another user for using AI. That user said that the

More ›