RIMR

74 ms·

961.
by RIMR 7y ago
You've got that backwards. Most criminals are poor because poverty drives people to crime.
962.
by RIMR 7y ago
Not EXACTLY what you're describing, but check out http://projectmf.org/
963.
by RIMR 7y ago
Your brain handles facial information differently than it does any other visual information. Most visual information is processed by your Occipital Lobe. But facial information is processed by your Temporal Lobe. To be fair, facial recognit
964.
by RIMR 7y ago
I can play a whole song in my head, and then realize that I don't know the words, and when I try to get the words out of the song in my head, I can't understand them, because my brain only committed the musical parts, not the lyri
965.
by RIMR 7y ago
I suspect that everyone has an inner dialog, but the defining difference could be on which side of your subconscious it's on. It might not be that some people don't have an inner dialog, it could be that those people aren't c
966.
by RIMR 7y ago
I think one can convey the feeling of "wishing something were real" into spoken words without actually thinking those exact words to themselves. It's like when you are hungry, and decide to eat. You didn't have to tell
967.
by RIMR 7y ago
I feel like I might actually fall somewhere in between. I can definitely think "in my voice", but I almost always do this when I am reading, writing, or formulating something to say verbally. It is almost always a conscious effor
968.
by RIMR 7y ago
Your first point is moot, because a person could point a gun at you even when you don't have your computer and demand your passwords, or even kidnap you and force you to log on somewhere else. This solution doesn't aim to prevent
969.
The Case of the 24,368 Read Receipts (2011)(practical365.com)
1 points by RIMR 7y ago|0 comments
970.
by RIMR 7y ago
I use Asterisk to tie a bunch of my shit together. I even have little burner phones that can do all sorts of cool things thanks to modern SIMs and VoIP tech. What's your podcast? I'll bookmark it for later.
971.
by RIMR 7y ago
That's hilarious! You think the American right would be pro-regulation...
972.
by RIMR 7y ago
I would much rather see the financial elite in America expropriated so that corporate leaders are less likely to buckle to China for short-term profit.
973.
by RIMR 7y ago
That's pretty incredible that you read this article so fast that you managed to misread the ~30 instances of "GE" and "General Electric" as "GM" and "General Motors", and never noticed the giant
974.
by RIMR 7y ago
Employees are excited about non-cash benefits because they were told by their employers that they are worth getting excited about. Employers are excited about non-cash benefits because it cuts risk by reducing their overall obligation to th
975.
by RIMR 7y ago
Those are examples of business interests, but if any business that doesn't care about the physical and financial wellbeing of its workers is a business we are better off without. "We made a profit" is never an excuse for unet
976.
by RIMR 7y ago
If you value living a moral/ethical life, then working for a company that operates immorally/unethically would be bad. If your only considering career benefits in terms of career advancement compensation, then perhaps doing the ri
977.
by RIMR 7y ago
I really don't like some of the philosophies expressed in this article. The whole "put family members in jail" bit feels like a worthless appeal to emotion. If your family member is a mass murderer, I really don't care
978.
by RIMR 7y ago
I don't get THIS attitude. None of those things are ethically justified via your "somebody's gonna go it anyway" philosophy.
979.
by RIMR 7y ago
They're not looking for anyone. They're looking for evidence that the scope manufacturer illegally exported to countries that they weren't allowed to, and tracking app downloads is certainly a way to do that.
980.
by RIMR 7y ago
If you had read the article, you would realize that the users of the app aren't under suspicion. The feds want to know where the app was downloaded, because they're trying to figure out all the countries that the scope manufacture
981.
by RIMR 7y ago
A return to the bad old days of cable bundles, coupled with the current average Internet speed, would just bring back the good old days of torrenting.
982.
by RIMR 7y ago
So you read the part where Greenspan accurately called Trump a Fascist, and that hurt your feelings? I hate to break it to you, bud, but Donald Trump is definitely a fascist.
983.
by RIMR 7y ago
I'm going to say it was the moment the article (rightfully) referred to the President as a fascist.
984.
by RIMR 7y ago
I think it's really interesting that you just stopped reading the moment the article challenged your existing political beliefs. That was very close-minded of you to abandon the article the very moment it forced you to think outside of
985.
by RIMR 7y ago
$84 is really steep for a product I don't even get a sample of. They really should offer the first lesson for free so people know what they're paying for. I pride myself on my strong soft skills, so I know I won't be paying t
986.
by RIMR 7y ago
Yes. If you work at an address, and someone tries to contact you via the mail at that address, and they put your work address and name on the envelope, then there is a legal obligation that you receive the letter, or the post office be info
987.
by RIMR 7y ago
Again, I already made it clear that this has nefarious purposes. But there is zero utility in keeping the larger dataset secret. Society is not safer as a result. The only reason they ever framed it the way they did was to get media attent
988.
by RIMR 7y ago
I think you're making a silly mistake actually giving this "too dangerous for society" line any validity. I understand that this tech could be used for nefarious purposes, but this isn't world-ending tech. This is just
989.
by RIMR 7y ago
Can we actually expect OpenAI to remain "open" with investments like this getting dumped into the project? I'm still waiting for the 1.5G GPT-2 set to get released, but they're still going with that "too dangerous f
990.
by RIMR 7y ago
No, you're exactly right. If someone sent a letter to me, but they accidentally put your address on it, you would be committing a felony against me if you opened the letter, even though it was delivered to your address. You would know

More ›