RIMR

41 ms·

601.
by RIMR 3y ago
Imagine reading the OP comment and not recognizing it as hyperbole.
602.
by RIMR 3y ago
I don't think it's safe to write off that 1% if you don't first make sure you understand who that 1% is and how decisions like this, especially at scale, could harm those people. If a person says that they are eligible to wor
603.
by RIMR 3y ago
People act like this price tag is high, but it's not the product you're paying for, it's the guarantee that the reference material has been exhaustively tested to meet an exact standard. This is a small price to pay if you&#x
604.
by RIMR 3y ago
"Unknown CSAM" just means scanning all your files with AI to judge content. They can't be searching for infringing material that they haven't seen before, they'd have to train a model to interpret images. Which mean
605.
by RIMR 3y ago
The entire argument can be summed up like this: It is impossible with current technology to completely eliminate any photos or videos from existence. So long as the Internet exists, and people have access banned media, that banned media wil
606.
by RIMR 3y ago
>This is an attempt to solve the right problem (CSA) Is it though? Does punishing people for possessing CSAM actually have any effect on the rate of CSA? I'm not saying criminalizing CSAM isn't the right choice, but is there an
607.
by RIMR 3y ago
If all of the urbanites changed their minds and moved to rural areas, there would be no more rural areas. The suburban sprawl would just end up creeping in and destroying the nature that exists there. Feel as irked as you want about it, you
608.
by RIMR 3y ago
It sounds to me like the US released a report about NK espionage operations, and then people "thought" (as the article phrases it) that NK operatives were everywhere, and now we have this article that just seems to tie the most ob
609.
by RIMR 3y ago
You seem to have interpreted this in a strongly partisan way for some reason. Nobody accused any specific party or groups of spreading disinformation. This was not a tribalistic argument. and by your own account you seem to understand that
610.
by RIMR 3y ago
Knowing that the economy is only going to get larger and more complex, how is the constant lobbying to keep the system inefficient not making it more complicated? Did you have a specific counter-argument, or just thought-termination?
611.
by RIMR 3y ago
lmao, just saw this. Imagine defending a guy's tech literacy by pointing out that he wrote a basic threaded social website over 16 years ago that since has only seen minor tweaks to the CSS, and no added features, largely because it wa
612.
by RIMR 3y ago
Funny you bring that up, because 27% of all US Government systems run Linux. The problem is that the government doesn't give back any money, or contribute much code to the FOSS projects that they rely on. If they gave back proportional
613.
by RIMR 3y ago
I don't think governmental functions like tax collection should be subject to the free market. Where does this end? Do we end up with private militias that compete with municipal police departments? Do we end up with private militaries
614.
by RIMR 3y ago
https://billmoyers.com/story/how-lobbying-by-tax-preparer-he...
615.
by RIMR 3y ago
This is overly optimistic. Intuit is the leader in this space, and they haven't produced a compelling new feature in decades. They have spent far more of their energy fighting the government to maintain their status quo than doing anyt
616.
by RIMR 3y ago
The source is ARIN itself, and they clearly state what he did: >the elaborate scheme involved the use of legally registered but non-existent companies Golestan claimed were “Channel Partners” to defraud not only ARIN but also the entire
617.
by RIMR 3y ago
That's right, this is a pro-showing-buttholes-to-children community.
618.
by RIMR 3y ago
But there are instructions in the article: >Yesterday one of my collaborators googled "sqword" and to his surprise, there were tons of first-page results that weren't the sqword.com domain.
619.
by RIMR 3y ago
It sounds like you're making an argument about people's relationship to truth that pivots entirely around the unknowns presented by AI, and not around historical truths about how disinformation already works.
620.
by RIMR 3y ago
Post truth society is already here. Disinformation has been on the rise the past couple of decades, and the results are clearly visible: conspiracy theories, election misinformation, and divisive politics where people's worldviews vary
621.
by RIMR 3y ago
There are 82 items in the collection, you could do a little scraping and run all the downloads through uGet or similar download manager. Plus, each item has an auto-generated torrent. They aren't very fast generally, but you could theo
622.
by RIMR 3y ago
I can churn out 20-100k images/day from Stable Diffusion on budget of $7/day, and I am training my own LoRAs on my own photography. I can run nearly any LLM on a similar budget. Self-hosted AI is here to stay, and once the technol
623.
by RIMR 3y ago
It's honestly so short sighted. From a corporate liability standpoint, I get that hosted services need to avoid giving out harmful information, but trying to coral that from a software perspective is going to be impossible. Pandora&#x2
624.
by RIMR 3y ago
Not a lot of unbiased news right now. The media won't talk about the history of this issue because it might look bad for our ally, the right is using this to attack their opponents, and the left won't draw the line between being p
625.
Prop Pagers(pagersdirect.net)
1 points by RIMR 3y ago|0 comments
626.
by RIMR 3y ago
0.5g/serving trans fat threshold is even worse when you consider that there is absolutely no regulation for serving sizes. If a company exceeds the limit on trans fat, they don't have to recall the product, they can just decrease
627.
by RIMR 3y ago
This is another "known to the state of California" issue, but there's no reason to minimize that as if it means nothing. We only see that language because California is the only state in the USA that takes action about food s
628.
by RIMR 3y ago
Yeah, but are there verified harms that would justify banning it? You're only listing its uses, which aren't of any real concern.
629.
by RIMR 3y ago
Because the devices aren't illegal, and have legal uses, but eBay is being held responsible for the illegal ways end users use these devices. The only real violation that might have occurred here is not removing listings for these devi
630.
by RIMR 3y ago
Time to learn everything they scan for, and set up a honeypot that makes people's Amazon devices fill with dummy devices.

More ›