Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
RIMR
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
>The person on the other side has the same tools you do. No, they don't. I have access to heaps of raw information about customers and their systems that I can easily provide to my AI. That AI can also dig through all the communicat
32.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
People keep getting caught because they are getting too close. For ~$500 you can buy a tattoo/hair removal laser from China with enough power to blow the camera sensor to hell from a few hundred feet.
33.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
It's the central plot point of the entire series. If that's not "exploring the concept", you're going to have to explain why.
34.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
From the article: >This wouldn't have been an issue if the organization bought a $1,000 NAS and populated it with a few hard drives. Look, I know that a certain percentage of Tom's Hardware articles are just sales pitches for a
35.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
Your brain is gonna lose so much weight!
36.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
> But after the study controls for age the starkness of the effect more or less disappears (eyeballing Fig 1, the 2nd graph). Adjusting for age, Alzheimers deaths were 1/100 for taxi drivers, and 1/60 for the general public. Th
37.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
Because Metasploit is just for known vulnerabilities, while AI is digging around looking for new 0-days to exploit. Because Metasploit gives the decision to be malicious entirely to the human user, while AI might do something malicious unpr
38.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
Correct me if I am wrong here, but isn't this just a low-quality camera sensor attached to a gimmicky transparent LCD? This is an interesting novelty, but as others have mentioned already, the function of the viewfinder doesn't ma
39.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
For anyone confused, turn off your dark mode extension. :)
40.
▲
Cost of Living by Robert Sheckley (1952)
(gutenberg.org)
5 points
by
RIMR
2mo ago
|
1 comments
41.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
Believe it or not, you are legally bound to act in the interests of shareholders. Though you cannot be pardoned from civil stuff, and the options to actually prosecute are pretty slim, so I doubt it. Though, even if this is just tongue-in-c
42.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
Sounds like someone took huge risks, incurred huge losses, and thought they were entitled to always win. It honestly feels good seeing these folks get knocked down a peg.
43.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
I feel like the people who did this are simultaneously smart and stupid. Like, this is a really interesting idea, but the methodology here is wild. Why do they consider such a short list of things to be "all the tools of a real busines
44.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
Most of the people getting busted for AI-generated CSAM aren't just prompting an AI to generate inappropriate images. They are running pictures of real kids through nudifying apps. Nonconsensual pornography is nonconsensual pornography
45.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
Well, AI and Copyright are both related things that people created, so it's certainly relevant. I don't think the person you're responding to misspoke.
46.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
Yes, that is what the person you are responding to is saying. That's why they are questioning the assumption that this practice extends to 18th-century books that are solidly in the public domain. If it is happening, it is an outrage.
47.
▲
by
RIMR
2mo ago
I feel outraged, but I also worry this article isn't necessarily responding to what's actually happening. It's a weird practice to destroy a book when you digitize it, but it's at least an understandable legal strategy t
48.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
Drones have human operators. This is a murderbot.
49.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
This is an extremely important point to understand. At face value, it can feel like CSAM should be protected speech, however repulsive. There are no laws against gore videos, though one might argue that death is worse than SA. However, we h
50.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
This is an argument I find myself making depressingly frequently to people I thought knew better...
51.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
For reasons already outlined, I have doubts about their math. Targeting $250/kg payload costs is ambitious for a rocket that has not yet successfully reached orbit or proven cost-effective. Even if we do somehow succeed at affordably d
52.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
Let's just put it this way: The ISS produces about 120 kilowatts of electricity. An Nvidia Blackwell B200 GPU uses 1.2 kilowatts of electricity. So, you would need a similar array of solar panels and radiators just to power 100 of them
53.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
Oh please, what is with all of these pristine "engineer" workspaces? Every high-powered engineer I know lives in a pile of wires, boards, and monitors that evolves like a living organism.
54.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
Oh, that's the really fun part. The unprecedented catastrophic event is already happening. Several of them, in fact. By the time we notice, it'll be too late.
55.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
I don't care that the results are technologically impressive, the automation of creativity is dystopian. As I watched these videos and tried to compare what different AIs can do with similar budgets, is struck me to how utterly soulles
56.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
The point is that, at least presently, an algorithm lacks the creativity to meaningfully stimulate an intellectual person, and whatever excuse you give for the decisions that algorithm makes, you should never expect a human being to be more
57.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
The LLM critics are right, and that's why I try not to use AI in the ways critics point out are bad. I use AI to code tools for myself, but I don't pretend anything I make is production quality. Duct tape engineering has always be
58.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
What do you mean by this? The person you responded to never used the words "should" or "should not", and then you basically repeated what they said using more neutral words... What is so controversial about saying that S
59.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
A $2,500,000,000,000.00 startup. An underdog really.
60.
▲
by
RIMR
3mo ago
This whole article just boils down to the argument "If badly-behaved adults are allowed to have cameras, why shouldn't well-behaved children have access to for-profit social media platforms designed to addict them and feed them mi
More ›