R0b0t1

24 ms·

211.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Not that many people actually get fired in a hire fast fire fast workplace. The whole point of hiring this way is allowing yourself to not overprepare in an aversion to hiring poor talent. When you get a poor performer, you just let them go
212.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
> one property i've relying on is that the second virial coefficient minimum density is always lower than the saturated gas density.. until a threshold near criticality. A (or even the ) phenomenologically useful reason anyone ever
213.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
The only alternative is subsidizing people moving to California. Why bother doing that? If you leave it alone the property values will equilibrate to what you can reasonably support.
214.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Historically the penalties for grifting these programs are nothing in the vast majority of cases, if it's even discovered. The problem is a bunch of frontloaded vetting that is never followed up on.
215.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Hire fast fire fast is by far the best one, should you really need it. A 20 minute technical conversation and then firing within 2-3 weeks if they do not seem self-directed has worked in my experience. If you can't get someone up to sp
216.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
The reactor doesn't need to touch the rock
217.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Not knowing the result is the point. You develop novel viruses that you may not be able to imagine and then study how they impact an organism. This is useful.
218.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
The potential benefit is developing novel viruses. That's it. They will likely be infectious. Hopefully , ahem, your operating protocols prevent the release of that virus and you study it in model organisms to figure out metabolic pat
219.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Stupid GoF research has those risks. Totally eliminating a research methodology because of possible bad actors is just like how nuclear energy was delayed for decades because of green ooze.
220.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Where's the improvements list? I can't see it.
221.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
A real enterprise WiFi rollout might provision 1 access point for 1-4 people to keep access speeds high, depending on cube or office layout. WiFi shouldn't be expected to penetrate walls well. If you take normal WiFi hardware and try t
222.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
I'm aware they'll fake court orders too, which is your defense if you piss off the court. Sadly this is only an issue that can be solved by the recipients doing more verification. If the courts offered more verification, you still
223.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
The only real reason you get charged with contempt is for ignoring the warrant. If you try to verify it you're not ignoring it. If you ignore something that's not a warrant they're SoL. It's my understanding these "
224.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
They'll lose their case if all they did was call you and make a demand. Expecting them to show up in person in some capacity and show you the paperwork is fully reasonable. For a while they mostly operated with letters and sometimes re
225.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Yes? Tech companies don't have to do arbitrary things for whoever calls up. The court or law enforcement official has to convince you they are real and that they have a warrant.
226.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
It was made too expensive due to people who don't understand of it and are scared of it.
227.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Well, Google is trying to get you to pay for it by putting you at risk of account suspension via poor policies. If Google wants to neutralize spammers that's their business. The law doesn't have to stop them. But causing severe fi
228.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Seems reasonable to make Google liable for your damages. They've incentivizing people to use their store, and then pulling the rug out from under them. Similar logic has already been applied in the US for e.g. rapes that occur on a bus
229.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
It gets even worse. MS can't open source Windows because there's licensed third party components. A lot of silicon vendors can't open source their design for the same reason.
230.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Depends where you draw your boundaries. Physical access is always going to be complicated, but on larger scales (and increasingly as you can make things smaller) you can have a cap tank that must accumulate enough charge to do reliable brow
231.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
You're not imagining the stuff you can do with raw sensor access.
232.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Fr fr no cap that shit bussin dawg, gotta relate to the chilluns mang
233.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
It was per plane, like $80-$200?
234.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
But why? If the complaint is just about the logo this makes no sense.
235.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Europe is not some magical place where everyone goes to college. Lots of people don't, and have no ability to go, because the billets are fixed by statute.
236.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
But IIRC you need an active directory domain, so a server license to run this all off of.
237.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
They go based on tech reviews. It's fairly clear to me the author doesn't care about real usability. People will often ask questions like "can I run X on Y" and get a clear answer. But there are some people who don'
238.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
Yeah, I got confused. Those are harder to reduce cost on. I had this conversation previously about javelins, etc.
239.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
I'm just telling you what a fair number of people think. Separate what I am telling you from what I may believe.
240.
by R0b0t1 5y ago
And what is your point? The practical effect of these ADA trolls is the complete shuttering of useful things that could not be made accessible in a reasonable fashion. E.g. universities have removed websites because they don't have the

More ›