R0b0t1

11 ms·

61.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
I'm not entirely sure what you mean to ask nor am I a Chinese speaker, but I have myself suspected that the massive variety of characters was a side-effect of having a middle class that was differentiated based on their ability to read
62.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
Perfect is the enemy of good enough.
63.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
Linux has fallen behind in boot security and anti-tampering because all of the solutions in this area are proprietary and at least initially released under NDA. You're using the effects of this very program to justify itself.
64.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
The deal is I want to control the secure boot process so that I can make the OS I choose secure. This is not always an option or possible.
65.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
That is true, but disabling firmware update (should) limit the available persistence for the malware.
66.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
I think it is more likely they shifted a power of two over implicitly by a base 10 place value instead of a binary one. Or multiplied by 10. Unsure why. But, seems simpler. 52 is notable as 2^4 + 2^3 = 24, 24 + 24 = 48, 48 + 2^2 = 52. But 5
67.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
It's a power of two shifted by a decimal place value instead of a binary one. Unsure why.
68.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
Doctors aren't actually that good at their jobs once you start recording patient outcomes. It probably makes no sense to continue the current method, but the AMA is the one that controls it, and making it hard makes the value of their
69.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
You forgot the metabolic cycles of the signalling molecules and their receptor proteins, as well as the ion pumps important for those reactions. I think that is really what the professor was going for. Also, perhaps, some [partial] descript
70.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
Saving the life of an animal over a human is murder.
71.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
There is the chance the computational model is wrong.
72.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
FPGA count?
73.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
The hardware is the universe. People are the software. You are an aperiodic crystal that exhibits complicated, time-dependent behavior.
74.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
I agree with your assessment, but if your opponent is truly hostile it's not going to work. One person steelmanning and the other person strawmanning has a tendency to suffer from the same problem as always: to a superficially interest
75.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
His suggestion is reasonably cheap, however. The sawing machines already exist for embedding the car sense wires at traffic lights. Reusing traffic lights (where there will be power and may be a telephone or other connection) could work for
76.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
A more compelling theory suggest that money has value because it is coercively used to extract value from a society via taxes. People desire it because the government's monopoly on force requires them to pay taxes in it.
77.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
To clarify why I think you might be punished if you check and mess up: that's kinda how it works for rendering aid in a crisis. People have refused to render aid because they feared they would be sued. Even if you expect an airtight ac
78.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
You're right. Precision really isn't the right word. I meant something more like most useful. In the field that produced this paper, eV is going to be the most convenient way to specify it, because it relates to the movement of el
79.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
The law doesn't say you have to check so you don't. They'd basically have to tell you they're a prohibited person for a DA to have an airtight case. I bring this up because people like yourself slowly erode rights by doi
80.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
I hate to be the one, but he's right: more background checks is hilariously unpopular outside of blue cities and states. A lot of people in red states, even in cities, think that the gun regulations we have are too strong.
81.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
It's a bad idea to check ID. If you check and get it wrong it may conceivably be used against you. The law does not require you to check and you should never check. Simply refuse to sell if they plainly state they are a felon or not a
82.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
It's a thoughtcrime and a terrible law because of it. There's a ton of these w.r.t. gun laws in the US. Say the wrong thing and you get ten, say something slightly different and you get zero.
83.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
The authors likely didn't analyze it. It gives a value in eV, that can be extrapolated outwards though I am not exactly sure how. It would also depend on how you implement the process. However, the paper does mention the reactor is at
84.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
It's measured in eV as it's the most precise* measurement you can make. Ultimately it does turn into enthalpy. Process takes place at 21 bar and 300-500C. I do not see this being efficient unless powered by nukes. This is fine tho
85.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
They might be the same for some animals.
86.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
Try buckwheat and rye as well.
87.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
You can do it without the cert, it's just the recyclers usually won't take your reclaimed refrigerant. I'd feel worse about it, but generally the HVAC companies in an area are extremely predatory and only quote out new system
88.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
It's not just the lack of space, growing indoors allows you to control the climate. This has a massive impact on efficiency.
89.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
It's an issue for the areas of the world currently facing food scarcity. Producing on-site is going to be cheaper if there is no distribution set up.
90.
by R0b0t1 4y ago
Definitely works. As I read about it and as I think it was originally studied, the link is feeding bacteria in your gut that release an SSRI-alike chemical that is addictive. When you don't give them carbs they don't/can&#x27

More ›