QwenGlazer9000

6 ms·

31.
by QwenGlazer9000 2mo ago
I did. And half the post was them talking shit about the SC. Maybe you should read the post?
32.
by QwenGlazer9000 2mo ago
Honestly after seeing the last election results I knew bad things were coming. The worst of the drama instigators managed to get elected.
33.
by QwenGlazer9000 2mo ago
I'm worried about taste because to me it seems like something like taste would be the best thing for a ML model.
34.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
And that's the crux. LLMs are the nuclear bomb, while AI is the fission. People refuse to stop building them even if they make things worse.
35.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
Forgive me for taking everything salesmen say with a grain of salt.
36.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
Dude it's not a system prompt, it's the training.
37.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
LLMs make things easier but can we not advocate for making them a dependency to configure our tools? Even open weight models aren't fully open source. It's basically like having the back end binary but not the source code. Use em
38.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
Describes how I feel.
39.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
You mean we're still gonna be employed doing the boring part while AI gets to do the fun part? I'd honestly rather they just automate every job at that point.
40.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
Not just Generic. Any of the finance guys on YouTube that aren't grifters will say this. Post-train on a single one of them and boom AI is a financial guru.
41.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
This. The bar has never been lower.
42.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
https://davidbessis.substack.com/p/the-fall-of-the-theorem-e... This blog post talks in depth about what you're talking about. It may interest you. It even talks about the future where math proofs are just Lean pr
43.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
Yeah no
44.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
No. We do not. So many people are nostalgic about 30 years where you could afford basic things on minimum wage for a reason.
45.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
I'm sick of having my shit be locked down because of "security". Do these people even know tech illiterate people? They couldn't enable ADB even with instructions.
46.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
Arch users are basically beta testers. Near same day updates with upstream.
47.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
Sounds cool. What should we call the magit equivalent for got? Magot? Maggot?
48.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
The problem is that learning never stops. You can't just go through school, become a junior in X field, then start using AI. Then you'll forever be a junior. You have to make a choice when you're working a job: either use
49.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
You're absolutely right!
50.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
I agree. If only work would let me do this...
51.
by QwenGlazer9000 3mo ago
Are you fr?
52.
by QwenGlazer9000 4mo ago
It took me so long to finally have someone else not hyping up SDD. It's the new thing at work and it's driving me insane. I'm surprised no one tried fudging numbers though. That's usually what happens IME.
53.
by QwenGlazer9000 4mo ago
It's not complexity its questionable documentation. Picking up Nix is really hard yet the best we got is a mishmash of unofficial recourses and many of them are out of date and/or focus on the packaging side which is terrible for
54.
by QwenGlazer9000 4mo ago
Chezmoi strikes a nice balance between the overkill of home-manager while still being more powerful than simpler solutions. Yadm is another alternative, the main thing I don't like about it though is that I'm not a fan of cross OS
55.
by QwenGlazer9000 4mo ago
As someone who actually uses musical instruments, it's not at all the same. If anything, traditional IDEs are closer to musical instruments, which seem to be going EOL if you listen to the hype bros.
56.
by QwenGlazer9000 4mo ago
Distros help a lot shielding you from the churn, but lazyvim is maintained by folke who I hear loves breaking changes. Back when I used lazyvim I remember people complaining that he swapped out some major component randomly, I think it was
57.
by QwenGlazer9000 4mo ago
I've been seeing improvements lately other than the treesitter debacle, but this was literally the case 1 year ago.
58.
by QwenGlazer9000 4mo ago
It literally wasn't the case until relatively recently. It's an improvement in stability for the future, but the fact that before we had plug, then lazy, then finally we now have a built in one doesn't support the case necess
59.
by QwenGlazer9000 4mo ago
Yeah the lack of basic features in core meant core functionality was forced to use plugins with varying levels of documentation and commitments to stability (in some cases sending breaking changes before the supported neovim version even re
60.
by QwenGlazer9000 4mo ago
All the other comments in this thread talk about emacs instability when that hasn't been the case for me. I'm on doom emacs, update once in a while, and everything mostly just works other than some color scheme weirdness I had to

More ›