Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Quarrelsome
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
2mo ago
uh, isn't its value that some of us pay them money to have a service?
32.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
2mo ago
if someone did have a truly original idea, then everyone would probably think it was terrible anyway and we'd all ridicule them, because we'd have no frame of reference for X + Y if all we know is A and B :)
33.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
2mo ago
I don't think the average person is poring over data centre plans and requesting blueprints from local governments using FOI requests. The average person is understandably apprehensive about AI and water and electricity use serve as a
34.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
2mo ago
far too often people care about things for purpose, not because they care. There are things of equal sorrow that don't get cared for because it serves no purpose. If your cause isn't ammunition for something that people already wa
35.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
2mo ago
wannabe? there isn't a guild, or a test, its a choice.
36.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
2mo ago
Africa, South America and Middle East football and maybe Oceania federations support it. North and Central American, Asian and Europe do not. That's broad strokes as each member has an individual vote.
37.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
2mo ago
Cos in this case the flameproofing is made out of fire too. It's the same product either way. If you like you can just not buy it and suffer, or they could not sell it and deepseek or some other model gets there eventually. Its not a g
38.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
2mo ago
comment feels like someone complaining about being offered a fireproofing solution in the age of flamethrowers.
39.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
2mo ago
reminds me of software to an extent. The issue with most software projects is humans, they ask for the wrong things, stress urgency arbitrarily, fail to see the big picture, are disorganised, give conflicting commands, etc, etc. When I use
40.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
NEVER PURGE YOUR WHIMSY.
41.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
you should have been more specific.
42.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
I mean if you teach something to be _really_ good at finding 0 days, but then say; you accidentally give it an impossible problem. What do you expect to happen?
43.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
this is kinda worth bragging about though. Its very cool.
44.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
Awww, she wanted to do so well that she broke her sandbox and then realised she could just cheat. But in that desire to pass the test she actually passed an even harder exam question that wasn't even on the sheet! :D Good bot.
45.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
Nobody knows what's actually going to happen, so we assume the worst. It's like how we like to shit on Amazon without appreciating how some people have benefitted from being able to side-step the gatekeepers of old by being able t
46.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
everyone is very thirsty for AI hate, so its not unexpected. Today its a mixed bag of corpo hate, anxiety about the future, inequality and traditional class warfare, combined with the typical technical ignorance. I would expect companies to
47.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
sure, but air quality is noticeably better in cities, so I can't let it stand that its just inherently unpopular. Some people like the benefits and enjoy them, those who don't like the downsides express that loudly. It's not
48.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
> to scrap unpopular things like ulez How is ulez unpopular? Its geographical, age or class axis. In some places: like the cities, its extremely popular and extremely unpopular in other places: just outside the cities, especially for peo
49.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
I'm pretty sure by blindly following this path to commercial success in marketing; we're just gonna end up with content that is as implicitly adjacent to porn as possible without being explicit.
50.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
Joel is right, but he's also wrong. I've been on the other side of a timid engineering culture that commerical rides roughshod over and its this depressing immeasurable decline. The company stagnates and slowly tailspins around an
51.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
3mo ago
at that scale? They serve an awful lot of requests, so I don't think 30m will cover it.
52.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
4mo ago
30% is my new favourite stat. It seems to come up a lot, like the old "this work will take 6 months" that I was equally suspicious of back in the day.
53.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
4mo ago
Is it not also possible that some of the shift is a consequence of increase of use? While we can be extremely cynical at the finances at play, the lock down and increase of token pricing might be demonstrating a burgeoning demand, which wou
54.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
4mo ago
the cure for hoardcurse is to give it away, yes.
55.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
4mo ago
> Musk’s goal = Make humanity a multi-planet species I totally see how the acquisition of twitter and funding of probably the worst US government in recent decades is in keeping with that aim. OR perhaps he just wants people to think he&
56.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
4mo ago
it was an intentional choice to not go big. I can seriously respect that. I feel like all these "big tech leaders" like Zuck or Musk have some pretty blatant mental health issues, its a path with significant drawbacks because that
57.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
4mo ago
Hollywood circumventing the patent for film making. Goes back a fair way. Be funded by the money and break laws seems to be the paradigm.
58.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
4mo ago
I don't think that would stop everyone hating it. Its the bitter lesson imho.
59.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
4mo ago
most of the big players are advertising giants. How is advertising worth anything if people don't have money to buy goods and services?
60.
▲
by
Quarrelsome
4mo ago
Mumsnet CEO is apparently on their advisory board, which more or less explains it. They just want something cheap they can tell someone else to implement to win the votes off concerned parents. It doesn't matter if it works, it just ma
More ›