PeterStuer

5 ms·

61.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
I had not heard of VIA since the 1990's.
62.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
Rocketman the Master Blaster, is that you?
63.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
Maybe it is because it is late on a friday, but as someone self-hosting 'hobby scale' sites, i honestly could not make it through the second chapter of this ramble.
64.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
Isn't scalping illegal in some countries?
65.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
"The choice of Haskell has also led to a high quality and low volume of contributors" I feel this influence of choosing a tech stack and its impact on self selected and auto-reenforced culture is most often underestimated. From my
66.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
Not just exempting themselves, but actively building and deploying end-to-end encrypted chat apps for gov only use with (non)retention and (un)transparancy fully under their own control. Tbf, we're still waiting for Von Der Leyen'
67.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
What is the authority of the "repository maintainer" in question? It feels descisions like these far outstrip the pure technical.
68.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
I have seen the bar at the top appear with "BMW has a surprise for you" or something, but I always use Android Auto which starts a second later so I have never seen what this was. Still unacceptable.
69.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
"I want a free Lamborgini in your garage. You're just a NIMBY denying my need"
70.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
Maybe I'm old school, but if you can erase someone from your life because you block them on an app, this probably was not 'real-life'?
71.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
Once again, you use the passive. Change is active. Someone is doing the changing, and then they are trying to insult the people that refuse to let them have their way.
72.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
Hard disagree. Online friends are easy to ditch. Real life friends are around wether you like it or not. That fact alone has huge repercussions.
73.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
What about "I bought this property because I like this environment to live here" is difficult to understand?
74.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
It is not complicated. People buy a property because they like to live in that location. If you are going to drastically change that environment, you destroy the very reason they liked it so much they made it the biggest purchase of their l
75.
by PeterStuer 2mo ago
I remember first owners of the Apple Laserwriter sending out printed texts with 8 fonts used on every page. Not all blame is on the tech.
76.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
CEO does not want their job to be replaced by AI. Everyone else's? That is up for grabs and under good governance would be criminal not to do because cost savings.
77.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
No, you will be a 'greeter' at a venue, a cleaner cheaper than the equivalent robot, a yes-mam serv in some corporate's division pfiefdom, or doing some endless sysiphus task for the ethernity of your days to get your daily r
78.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
So why not license it for free to those model companies that also share their models with the public? Why would Moonshot not get free access?
79.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
Can the proposed consent automation kill the 'legitimate interest' abuse is the most important question. Even getting towards a single click refuse all requirement would eliminate the majority of dark patterns endemic today.
80.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
For me (non native speaker), compromise and tradeoff or not completely the same, and I would favor the latter for this article. Tradeoff conveys the coupling of the alternatives. Design for one goal trades away another. Compromise does not
81.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
Most of the internet unfortunatly ploinks fown a 'free' service and never even looks at what it defaults to. E.g., quite a lott of cloudflare "protected" sites block their rss feeds from being read by machine.
82.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
Universal tax collector of the internet. A penny for every page access. ADOG will not mind as it cements their incumbent status and pulls up the drawbridge by erecting a huge financial barrier for any new entrant.
83.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
Just ask yourself: who benefits from this "disclosure" ?
84.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
You can call out regulatory capture evwn when you would do the same if the shoe were on the other foot.
85.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
Please reread your commment and think about maybe you are not politicaĺly polarizing issues that should not be.
86.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
The ruse is becoming so obvious. OpenAI needs a bailout and regulation protection so badly they can't even hide it in the least.
87.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
Fully agree but ... Industry reality is that for bespoke software solutions we have been running for decades on non-technical people straight out of a 5 day "boot camp" copy/pasting together "solutions" from SO, or
88.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
What if Enron and CDO's had a baby ...
89.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
There are plenty SXM to PCIe adapters and I do expect these to keep up with newer generations as demand surfaces. But apart from homelabbers, will there be enough demand to have a reasonable secondary market outlet? The scenario after all i
90.
by PeterStuer 3mo ago
Learning from crypto, a GPU's life foes not end because it fails, althougg ofc that happens, but because an alternative comes along that makes running the old equipment no longer power efficient under the new market conditions.

More ›