PUSH_AX

40 ms·

61.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
A CSP.
62.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
> I just use telegram. And how do you just get everyone you want to speak to use telegram?
63.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
If it ain't broke...
64.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
Not OP, I use TS but only because it’s the only option. TS is a build your own typing sandbox, more than enough rope to hang yourself. Coming from typing systems that are opinionated, first class citizens of their languages, it doesn’t stan
65.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
> it runs its own reputation system that has absolutely nothing to do with anyone else’s opinion of you. If you don’t do certain things “correctly” (meaning Gmail’s own definition), you get marked as spam. Good?
66.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
Becoming a pragmatic engineer takes time, you’ll get there one day. Best of luck.
67.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
> I see it differently: what I'm proposing is developing mastery over a core tool of the craft, and applying it consistently in our work. This is classic dogmatics over pragmatics. The carpenter understands how to use every tool, th
68.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
That sounds clever until you remember tools exist to solve actual problems. Treating simple workflows as inferior is like saying a carpenter is amateurish for not using every attachment in the workshop. Some teams don't have enough ups
69.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
Look, I'll make this easy to understand. The parent comment that this stems from said: > It can't convey what decisions were made, what alternatives were discarded, what business motivations may have led to that code. If you&#x
70.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
I don't like complex systems, and I work hard not to create them.
71.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
Yes, but not in the form of commit messages, the parent comment described things better suited to jira tickets, documentation etc. It feels like we're trying really hard to stretch the utility of commit messages here...
72.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
The world will not end. I’ll get there.
73.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
Fine, but none of that is in a normal commit message, lets be real...
74.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
> Useless? So you never use “git annotate” or your IDE to see who wrote a line of code whose purpose puzzles you, and go to the commit message to see what they were trying to accomplish? Personally no, the code is the "truth".
75.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
I think it's a stretch to measure leadership quality on something so minor, a lot of teams find them pretty useless no matter how good they are.
76.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
Nothing has been broken yet, however data can be collected now and be cracked when the time comes, hence why there is a push.
77.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
This has to be an ad right? Affiliate link in the blog, non sensical reasoning for switching (single point of failure to... another single point of failure) etc
78.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
People are voting with their wallets
79.
by PUSH_AX 6mo ago
Is Jq slow?
80.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
I'd pay to watch someone say this in a court of law...
81.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
The hardest part about any creativity is hiding your influences
82.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
So they’re training a model
83.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
> There is so much money to be made repackaging open source these days These days? Almost every tech offering in existence is 1000+ OSS dependencies gaffer taped together with a sprinkling of business logic. Cursor isn't a shocking
84.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
Probably a country that has done so in the past, like the UK…
85.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
> how does one defend against an attacker or red-team who controls the CPU voltage rails The xbox does have defences against this, the talk explicitly mentions rail monitoring defences intended to detect that kind of attack. It had a lot
86.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
“Trust me bro”
87.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
If you don’t recognise the parallels then I don’t know what to say really. All the best.
88.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
Good. Your initial comment makes no sense.
89.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
This is not what is advertised, and if it was there would be no money in it.
90.
by PUSH_AX 7mo ago
if a person pays for a Nike product and receives a counterfeit, are we saying no harm no foul if they don’t realise?

More ›