PKop

28 ms·

361.
by PKop 2y ago
"Most places say AuthN and AuthZ" is what the post is arguing against.
362.
by PKop 2y ago
Isn't this what this post is about?
363.
by PKop 2y ago
Absolute garbage-tier nonsense: "Let’s say you’re responsible for managing corporate travel. As new tools come in - travel booking tools, calendar management tools etc, - specific tasks get simplified and substituted by technology, but
364.
by PKop 2y ago
I'm sure it will be fine.. https://thechinaproject.com/2021/03/16/chinese-pharmas-big-p...
365.
by PKop 2y ago
Why was shilling for Amazon your first comment on Hacker News?
366.
by PKop 2y ago
I wonder if they're as bad at preventing knock-off drug supply from polluting their inventory as they are with retail products. I can't think of a product line I'd feel less comfortable buying from Amazon than pharmaceuticals
367.
by PKop 2y ago
Looks terrible and not all that similar.
368.
by PKop 2y ago
Not in the least. I'm looking forward to when this trend dies and all of these worse than useless features hopefully get scrapped. Meanwhile there is now extra hardware being put inside new laptops. I wonder if we'll be able to bu
369.
by PKop 2y ago
TSMC being the only game in town is what's bad for the market.
370.
by PKop 2y ago
You'd think at some point someone other than TSMC could make these types of chips too. The bigger issue here is there being only one supplier.
371.
by PKop 2y ago
> it feels like AI is pretty close as it is to acting autonomously > with simple planning they fall apart They are not remotely close to acting autonomously. Most don't even act well at all for much of anything but gimmicky text
372.
by PKop 2y ago
To do what with them? How about not putting any of them on there? Doesn't chatting with bots get boring very quickly?
373.
by PKop 2y ago
I think it's weird that folx find anything useful about these gimmicky toy "AI's" that make up nonsense and get in the way of using your computer; why would you want these things injected into every nook and cranny of yo
374.
by PKop 2y ago
>I know and care deeply about the country and its culture. Then why would you want foreign immigrants from places with a drastically different culture coming into your country? It makes no sense. >obviously not true I know many Swiss
375.
by PKop 2y ago
I'll note you didn't say "that's not true" because you know it is. You should be ashamed of yourself for wanting to oppose discourse that speaks truth, in service to upholding some religious incantation denouncing t
376.
by PKop 2y ago
Because we have more criminals.
377.
by PKop 2y ago
Don't excuse the fact that Chicago has around an 18 per 100k murder rate, while Zurich has a 3. I'm referencing murder rate as a proxy for overall crime as well. Now, many like to cope with this disgusting fact of conditions in US
378.
by PKop 2y ago
It's because immigration is increasing, and more non-Swiss are in the country.
379.
by PKop 2y ago
Low crime and being well off, along with good social norms and culture, likely all go together and come as a collection of traits of certain groups of people.
380.
by PKop 2y ago
>enables a few -Werror flags by default Presumably they can then be disabled when needed yes? Sounds like a better default.
381.
Claude AI – Name and Shame(old.reddit.com)
2 points by PKop 2y ago|2 comments
382.
by PKop 3y ago
Eugenics
383.
by PKop 3y ago
"inflation rate" is a nebulous thing. Interest expense and interest rates, concretely paid by people like any other expense is not any more nebulous than tracking other expenditures. We already know the interest rate and various
384.
by PKop 3y ago
What does any of this have to do with ignoring the price of money, a real cost that people have to pay?
385.
by PKop 3y ago
Interest expense is a real cost people pay. Why ignore it?
386.
by PKop 3y ago
Exchange rate is not synonymous with inflation rate. You didn't think other countries had no inflation did you?
387.
by PKop 3y ago
What is confusing? The argument for including them is that people pay them. >Blindly stacking Stawman nonsense that literally no one suggested
388.
by PKop 3y ago
Yea that's why I mentioned unemployment being so low now, nowhere to go but up, and once it does that will exacerbate recession. I do think Fed will lower because of recession yes. The damage will be done yes. It sounds like you do agr
389.
by PKop 3y ago
Short answer for why they would is the economy broadly can't sustain rates this high. But I think it's worth considering there are many that subscribe to the theory the Fed has almost no control over long term rates (mortgage ra
390.
by PKop 3y ago
That and/or rates

More ›