P5fRxh5kUvp2th

8 ms·

31.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
I'm aware.
32.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
When I was young I could give myself a time to wake up and wake up at that time. As I've gotten older I've lost the ability. But I would use it to get up 30 minutes early to play NES before school. My mother would make me go to
33.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
We'll never know, honestly. And if I'm being truthful, I struggle with evolution a bit. It's a bit like life. I understand how life could have eventually evolved to where we're at. But how did life _start_? Any specif
34.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
In addition, they've started collecting data _around_ gmail. You cannot sign up without a phone number now. They can absolutely do what they want with that phone number without breaking their promise to use your email for advertising
35.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
No vim emulator is "good enough" if you actually know vim, although jetbrains is probably the closest due to the configurability of it's plugin. there are almost always quirks, but the biggest issue tends to be when bridging
36.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
What you quoted was me explaining why I won't spend and hour on a novel-length response. If you're going to try and bring me to task, atleast be accurate.
37.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
I can't relate to this at all and I'm one of those "passionate programmers". Perhaps it just manifests itself differently, but things like I've always preferred PHP to RoR because the PHP community is so much more p
38.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
Posting such a response is attempting to impose upon me time that I am not willing to spend on you. It's disrespectful. The argument you're trying to formulate here is that being uninvited as a speaker at the grammy's isn&#x
39.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
you're confusing population risk with personal risk. Think about it like this. The chances of dying in a vehicle wreck is very small. But those who have died in them probably would have preferred finding an alternative means to get to
40.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
Sorry, I'm not reading all of that. I stopped at the second paragraph. The answer to the question doesn't actually matter, not to you, and not to me. It's a ploy to try and confound the conversation. If you and the other p
41.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
And I suppose if I felt it was honestly asked I might respond to it.
42.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
I thought it was just me because I'm not an expert on engines, but apparently not. And I agree with your last point, it was the other thing that was bothering me by it. What exactly is actionable here, to me it's just normal wear
43.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
Funnily enough, that's where I'm at too. Just don't use a state manager at all. There may be times when it's worth the cost, but otherwise just hang it on the global state and move on with your life.
44.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
If it starts to get unwieldy, that's an indication to me that I need to clean up my bookmarks, not that I need more tools to manage them.
45.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
> People say "paradox of tolerance" when I bring this up but I don't understand the purpose. Yes, And? It has a name and using that name allows for more succinct communication. It's also a way for those who are unfam
46.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
There's a difference between refusing to engage and actively trying to suppress.
47.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
It amazes me that so many people think trying to refute an example refutes the point. It doesn't, replace social with pack in my comment and move on if you must. The rest of your post is just trashy thinking. If you believe the ratio
48.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
Watch them juke and jive folks! sting like a snake, juke like a sloth! They went for the other one, that sure showed me! No mental gymnastics here folks, just good ole fashioned awesome-sauceness. --- or how about no, I reject it just as
49.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
And this is why history keeps repeating itself, everyone thinks it's different this time. Stalin-ism should not be a case study so you can do it right the next time, it should be a warning that you can't, even with the best of int
50.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
> Free speech can be used as the crowbar to motivate enough people to commit acts of vandalism and terrorism. you mean like dumping tea into the ocean to protest taxes and standing up a militia to rebel in order to establish a new govern
51.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
> One could set up a dress code or any other arbitrary policy as a proxy to refuse entry to any group, without explicitly doing so. Not in the US you can't. If a policy, even when applied equally, unduly affects a protected class,
52.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
you're describing the paradox of tolerance. The problem isn't that there's a line at which it becomes ok to remove yourself from, or them, forcibly. The problem is that line has to be very very extreme, which is why you'
53.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
That was word for word what I was going to respond with until I saw your post.
54.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
generally speaking that would fall under harassment.
55.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
In the US we have the saying "your rights end at the tip of my nose" to express much the same thing.
56.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIhFepY5G0w Ben Shapiro talking about it, I'll transcribe part of it here. > I feel bad for Ye. There are people who are bipolar in my family, like when people are in manic episodes,
57.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
Reminds me of something that happened in HS. I had a very religious teacher who went on a rant one day about the book 'The Clan of the Cave Bear'. Having read, and loved, the book I was at first very interested in his opinion on
58.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
> Could you provide an example of free expression, not committed to either "enlarging understanding" or "uncovering truth", that would be part of a useful conversation? "wanna fuck?" Now I get to watch you a
59.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
And to be crystal clear here, at least in the US. threats of violence, up to and including death threats, are completely legal. What's not legal is threats of violence with both the intent and the means to follow through. If an 80 year
60.
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th 4y ago
Their goal wasn't to be fair, it was to decrease liability.

More ›