Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
OtomotO
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
OtomotO
4mo ago
Simple solution (for now): don't do it under US jurisdiction.
92.
▲
by
OtomotO
4mo ago
You can read up anything and everything about a patent, but still not be allowed to reproduce it. The moment the LLMs ingested any code under GNU General Public License or similar licenses and reuse it without making the produced product av
93.
▲
by
OtomotO
4mo ago
Exactly. Although the EU isn't currently capable of competing at all, it slowly but steadily escapes the rectum of the United States. And China already is the current superpower, so they don't have to give a fuck about the US. US
94.
▲
by
OtomotO
4mo ago
I feel ya. I only paid 100 bucks, but I wanted to test the fable myself. I am not interested in Opus 4.8 in the slightest.
95.
▲
by
OtomotO
4mo ago
Are the packages in the repositories of arch also affected? No? Then it's not a problem. Every device in this household that isn't a smartphone runs on Arch. All my servers run on Arch. Never had a problem, because I don't bl
96.
▲
by
OtomotO
4mo ago
extending software with a plugin system
97.
▲
by
OtomotO
4mo ago
If you're unsure what you've installed from the AUR, use: pacman -Qm
98.
▲
by
OtomotO
4mo ago
WASI stands for WebAssembly System Interface. It has little to do with the webassembly in the browser. I use it to extend a native application, for example. No browser in sight at all.
99.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
Uhm, no? I have NO single project on Github. One of my clients has their project on GitHub. Every other client I have ever worked with or for ran and runs their own gitforge.
100.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
No AI at all, like 5/6 of my customers
101.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
> You've looked at 100,000 benchmarks? What about " The ones I had a look at " was unclear? > Yes we do disagree, yet one of us has statistics and rigor and one of us doesn't. Yup, that's true. So again, have
102.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
> Again congratulations on your conspiracy theory. I am neither impressed nor offended by any kind of argumentum ad hominem. I sincerely hope you have a wonderful day! > Benchmarks are not PR they are designed by a variety of institut
103.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
We are all doomed! Doomed I say!
104.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
The EU is slowly getting out of the rectum of the united states. Let's see if that trend continues.
105.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
I never said that I am not willing to believe the contrary. I am not willing to believe the contrary from strangers on the interwebs or PR departments of companies who want to sell me something. If people I genuinely trust tell me about the
106.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
So once you get to that scale it suddenly doesn't matter anymore and you can't be held accountable. But until then, be a good citizen? What? That's fucking feudalism... Peasants and Lords. If you're lucky enough, you
107.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
There is no data that I would trust that contradicts it. Frankly I don't give a damn about data that could be made up on the spot or appears to be scientific or meaningful while it's not at all clear how it was made (up). Claude w
108.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
Lol. If you're doing anything non trivial that's not a CRUD webapp but e.g. some physics simulation or high performance GPU code any and all models I've tried suck. They are not just leagues behind what experts would code, th
109.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
Bummer! When can I finally and confidently get slopcode into Zig?
110.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
Ah, American Hubris ... I don't blame you, Hollywood is the world's greatest propaganda machinery of all times.
111.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
With homo "sapiens" "sapiens"? A few decades at least.
112.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
https://github.com/thi-ng/ there doesn't seem to be a lot of clojure anymore? Unless clojurescript is tagged as typescript in github that is?!
113.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
> That’s a game changer and I don’t even know where we fit in. Doing non trivial work.
114.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
You're obviously not doing anything wrong if it works for you. It worked for me too, for months, when I was working on trivial web projects. Around February of this year it got lobotomized and I quit my subscription end of march. I am
115.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
You're not. People are just using a hammer to build a shed and telling you it's surely good to dig a hole too.
116.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
I disagree that we should build a human centered world. We already did that and it's hell for a myriad of other lifeforms.
117.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
Not to me. He turns around and changes his opinion more often than his underwear. And he is not the leader of the free world. Not since they bombed Vietnam.
118.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
> And to be honest, a LLM could have give me the same response. It could, or it could've hallucinated something :) But then again, I could too, if I smoked enough or fell on my head. Plus it would've produced more CO2 than I di
119.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
The lack of a feature is not the same as a bug. A bug means that there is a feature, but it's not behaving as was specified. (Or expected, or as it used to ... but clearly a difference to something, not to nothing) It doesn't matt
120.
▲
by
OtomotO
5mo ago
And here is where we disagree. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA_effect We are no further to general artificial intelligence than we were a decade ago.
More ›