Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
OtomotO
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
OtomotO
2mo ago
LiMux was such a hopeful project. Let's see whether times truly have changed with the reckless US administration and the total dependence on closed source US software. Maybe Europe will finally truly wake up.
32.
▲
by
OtomotO
2mo ago
Correct. If the premise doesn't hold, it's ex falso quodlibet for anyone.
33.
▲
by
OtomotO
2mo ago
> You at least need a capable machine, so that's not 0 monetary investment It is 0 monetary investment if I already have said machine lying around doing nothing. Which is exactly the story OP talked about.
34.
▲
by
OtomotO
2mo ago
> but it also led to a crackdown from the government but did it?
35.
▲
by
OtomotO
2mo ago
One of them is the fraud industry?
36.
▲
by
OtomotO
2mo ago
What's missing is a balanced view. People are easily divided and suddenly in a binary position. You're either totally pro AI and can't stop talking about it all the time, it's like your new god. Or you're a hater. A
37.
▲
by
OtomotO
2mo ago
But the US are the country of freedom! That's what Hollywood has been telling me my entire life!
38.
▲
by
OtomotO
2mo ago
But how much does ticket cost in China compared to the US? (Genuine question)
39.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
They are a monopoly in certain regions of the world. Even though I live in a western country, just one of my clients after all these years of being self-employed, uses GitHub. Nobody else would ever use it. And why would they? Especially fo
40.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
In some jurisdictions/countries they have to call some government service which then tells them whether a person is above or below a certain age. Theoretically you could make this double blind and that's the story they are telling
41.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
My self hosted gitforge disagrees.
42.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
I will not give them permission to store data about me, personally. So how can they target me specifically? Unless of course they do not honor the agreement... For me it's also not a problem. An ad is easily spottable, because an ad tr
43.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
The problem will always be to get your hands on hardware. Software never was the problem.
44.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
And the US calls itself a democracy and kills innocent people abroad. I don't see any merit in these simplistic world views. The world isn't Lord of the Rings, it's more A Song Of Ice And Fire.
45.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
It's incredible people still discuss the pelicans... But then again, the ad just works.
46.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
Sunk cost fallacy is already too established for anything else.
47.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
I do that as well, since I am my own business
48.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
Exactly that. I wasn't reachable by phone for company related stuff outside my regular working hours unless I had on-call-duty, which means it was working hours. I don't get why people would be proud about not setting boundaries.
49.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
Many years ago my mom chose to have the company pay for her private phone number. When she stopped working for them, they informed her, that the number legally belonged to them. It was not a problem for her, because she wanted to get rid of
50.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
> Java includes the JVM which is subject to way more security issues and needs much more frequent updating. Then releasing more often is better, because the security fixes get out of the door faster?! If previously a Java Update took 3 y
51.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
Unless you're forced at gunpoint, how can there be too many releases? Rust releases every 6 weeks, since 2016... If you don't want to update, just don't? If you feel (!) pressured, you should work on that.
52.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
Mhm, I just wonder how many samples they get and how much time they have to come to the conclusion. Like a short example is easier to grade, but not in the same ballpark as a whole codebase.
53.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
> Then, by giving them context or by post-training, you can make them sample non-average parts of the distribution they learned. How do you derive that something is "below average" or "average" or "above average&
54.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
> You haven't been using AI extensively I presume... Ex falso quodlibet > I've been programming a long time and considered myself among the top in my domain I am not trying to attack you, but you considered yourself that...
55.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
AI is an average coder. It was trained on all code the code that could be found. Not just code written by genius programmers like Carmack and Bellard. Given that it's average, I'd prefer a human coder above average :)
56.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
I am using Rust since 2016 productively... before I dabbled with it. Rust is not compiling any slower than a comparable C++ codebase for me. It is compiling much slower than a managed language like Kotlin, C# etc. though. Which is an unfair
57.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
> I can understand when you need the absolute best performance and you decide to drop to down to C++ What? Rust generally doesn't have worse performance to C++, so this argument makes no sense at all to me. > and I also relate wi
58.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
Depends on whether the answer o. Stackoverflow was given willingly or at gunpoint ^^
59.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA
60.
▲
by
OtomotO
3mo ago
The sad part is that you work in FINANCE of all things and this happens there. Like: What competence do decision makers in FINANCE have, when they are this oblivious to economics?
More ›