OtomotO

14 ms·

331.
by OtomotO 2y ago
Same, but I am only using it for couch gaming
332.
by OtomotO 2y ago
That's exactly what I tell my friends. I can't play certain games, because they don't run on Linux and even if they did, I am not gonna install a rootkit to run them.
333.
by OtomotO 2y ago
Interesting. I am happy with wasmtime though. Hacking on a wasm component model and wasi based plugin system these days. Having loads of fun. (I am aware of extism, but I am doing it for the fun :))
334.
by OtomotO 2y ago
"For example, suppose I have a block of code with variable names in under_score notation that I want to convert to camelCase." Oh my, oh my... How have I done this all these years before "AI" was a th- hype? I did it wit
335.
by OtomotO 2y ago
Ah, rose colored glasses never get old :) He was a CEO, that much can be said. The rest is up for debate.
336.
by OtomotO 2y ago
If he can't answer such a question, he shouldn't get to ask.
337.
by OtomotO 2y ago
Worse even: it's super bad for the environment
338.
by OtomotO 2y ago
I am sure you understand that I gave one, namely the latest, example of my experiences with ORMs over more than a decade and a half in various projects and tech stacks. They all ended the same way and whenever I have a say, I'll oppose
339.
by OtomotO 2y ago
I need to rewrite the parts that are broken and without going into too much details: it's a lot of code where we had no problems with hundreds of rows but now with thousands (so nothing, lol, I've worked on projects with hundreds
340.
by OtomotO 2y ago
As said, they have cost me too much time and money already, moreso as other devs on the team(s) lent heavily into certain features and I had to rewrite a lot of code.
341.
by OtomotO 2y ago
ORM has never worked for me in any language. Sooner or later we always hit the n+1 query problem which could only be resolved by a query builder or just plain old sql. It always was a mess and these days I can't be bothered to try it e
342.
by OtomotO 2y ago
I never understood why people care about dependencies that much. Either I write the code myself, or I pull in a dependency. Compile times I agree with though.
343.
by OtomotO 2y ago
It's not about concepts, it's not about language constructs but the overall work and mental load working with the languages. For me it's header files, no package manager, doing pointer magic all the time (void pointers are...
344.
by OtomotO 2y ago
Fair point, sorry (non native speaker here, for what it's worth) have a wonderful day!
345.
by OtomotO 2y ago
I would love a much simpler Rust...a Zig with a borrowchecker, a small stdlib (like Rust), some official package manager. I agree that Rust has a lot of syntactic warts but the common stuff I find beautiful
346.
by OtomotO 2y ago
To me C is much, much harder than Rust. I've written both, albeit way more Rust.
347.
by OtomotO 2y ago
Great now give me tooling of this millenium (no, I am not going back to vendor everything manually and I am not reinventing every basic data structure I wrote in University in ever project I work on) and we have a deal! Oh, also get rid of
348.
by OtomotO 2y ago
Aha, so you're saying that asymmetric marketing is bad (I agree) and as proof you put up some other asymmetric marketing, namely an influencer`s video... Hard pass :)
349.
by OtomotO 2y ago
No it's not, but when humans have invested too much (emotions or money) they do not retreat easily. They rather go all in. It's just another hype, people. Just like Client/Server, Industry 4.0, Machine Learning, Microservices
350.
by OtomotO 2y ago
No, it's fine if I have to pay (but I said as much in my initial post, didn't I?). A kotlin project paid my bills for a long time, so I am totally fine investing 200bucks/year. But I don't want to use IdeaVim anymore, I
351.
by OtomotO 2y ago
I loved JetBrains IDEs years back. These days I am mostly using NeoVim. I decided today to stop supporting JetBrains BECAUSE there is no good kotlin language server. I would gladly pay them money even if I don't use their IDEs if only
352.
by OtomotO 2y ago
So it should be called SubHTML instead?!
353.
by OtomotO 2y ago
(Honestly) Cool, the problem with such options is: it's the lifetime of the app, not mine.
354.
by OtomotO 2y ago
Absolutely. I want the basic functionality to work without JS. But we have a working application and users are not hating it and used to it. We rely on modals heavily. And for that I added (custom) JS. It's way simpler than alternative
355.
by OtomotO 2y ago
Sorry, but I have about 60€ in total for subscriptions per month. I am not going over that budget (despite not being poor, it's more of a principle) and 7$/month is too much. I totally understand that subscriptions are nice for th
356.
by OtomotO 2y ago
I am currently de-javascripting a React app of some project I am working on. It's a blast. It's faster and way more resilient. No more state desync between frontend and backend. I admit there is a minimum of javascript (currently
357.
by OtomotO 2y ago
More and more reliably. When people have an abo that cannot be quit every month it gives more financial security to the company. Previously people would buy e.g. the creative suite from Adobe and then work with that version for many, many y
358.
by OtomotO 2y ago
I have a different take on this: It depends on what you're actually building. For the business applications I build SSR (without any JS in the stack, but just golang or Rust or Zig) is the future. It saves resources which in turn saves
359.
by OtomotO 2y ago
Scared people. You can sell them almost anything. A tactic heavily used in politics all around the world ;-) And back then a lot of us were scared.
360.
by OtomotO 2y ago
Anything worth writing isn't covered by chatgpt

More ›