Operyl

26 ms·

271.
by Operyl 4y ago
Jeez, I was certain at this point he would never retract his articles. I feel like it's too little too late, imo, though.
272.
by Operyl 4y ago
We'll see, he's got his money invested in a lot of different areas, so I'm sure he'll be fine if this venture doesn't work for him. One thing I've noticed is that what he does largely is just based on what _he_
273.
by Operyl 4y ago
That's been his stance, a lot of the information and planning for the "Lab" have been exposed via their live Friday shows (WAN Show). They just got their power supply testing stuff, too. Linus seems to be really hedging on do
274.
by Operyl 4y ago
They've already stated it's going to have a pretty robust website with good search engine to filter through their test results and blog posts. Then they'll take certain tests and make videos on top of that for the main channe
275.
by Operyl 4y ago
The funny thing is that’s what is happening, the company is choosing to remove, ignore, and move on from these comments, and yet here we are. And here come the downvotes for stating a fact, yay!
276.
by Operyl 4y ago
Perhaps, but certainly not from me. For the past 2 years it has been a penny a month bill. My statement was mostly that their processing fees are pennies and they could have just waited a bit.
277.
by Operyl 4y ago
How weird, we get charged 0.01 all the time, and I laugh thinking that it cost them more to charge us a penny than it would've been to just roll it over.
278.
by Operyl 4y ago
Which brings me back to my initial post, despite the (mind you, high level engineer)'s opinion, you should probably stay way clear. Support will just not help you in certain situations, and it's not worth the risk. Was surprised t
279.
by Operyl 4y ago
Eh, this reads weird to me. So third party clients are "ignored," but things like Better Discord which modify the first party client are explicitly not kosher? I'd love for better clarification around this at some point hones
280.
by Operyl 4y ago
It was so so so much worse before, to be fair. We just see the limited stuff that does get through, for better or for worse.
281.
by Operyl 4y ago
> Maybe I'm the boomer longing for individual/group chats a la MSN messenger 20 years ago. :O I know, right? The thing is, the vast majority of the generation using this don't have these qualms, it works for them. This mus
282.
by Operyl 4y ago
Yes, you likely will. They have heuristics that will snuff out custom clients, and it's frequent to see people get nabbed by this. It's unfortunate, because from an abuse perspective I understand why (they have issues with spam fr
283.
by Operyl 4y ago
Yup! And that's where it gets significantly more complicated quickly.
284.
by Operyl 4y ago
Then, as a Tailscale customer for business, it'd still be great if you would prioritize the MDM stuff for my personal uses. Or just expose a field in the settings, even if it's behind some hidden menu.
285.
by Operyl 4y ago
They say this, but then looking at a recent issue they say it's not done in iOS yet, only macOS: https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/4299
286.
by Operyl 4y ago
But completely missing the thing that makes Tailscale great, imho: ACLs.
287.
by Operyl 4y ago
It seems likely to me that they do, they use Authy, and the employees that fell for the attack just supplied the codes they needed. Each time you get in, you can muddle around and figure out what is needed for the next time you send out an
288.
by Operyl 4y ago
I'm curious, if you'll disclose it, what the exclusionary policy was. Enterprise zones?
289.
by Operyl 4y ago
Usually rollouts like that are slow to prevent a flood of people using it at once, and to slowly open the flood gates. Not many people will manually change the flag, either. I don't think the fact that the feature flag was just client
290.
by Operyl 4y ago
I wonder if this is on purpose though, given the name of the site. You see it how you would experience most sites?
291.
by Operyl 4y ago
This is a slippery slope, the entire client is open source (besides some GUI bits for macOS/iOS/windows). Do we ban GitLab for more than once per month because it’s also commercial? What about SQLite?
292.
by Operyl 4y ago
It's worth noting that the Tailscale client is, almost entirely, open source. It's just the iOS/macOS/Windows client code that's closed source (just GUI wrapping it), iirc[0]. The DERP code is also open source. Addi
293.
by Operyl 4y ago
Exactly how I feel, the code it produces like that (unless it’s regurgitating a pattern I am already writing which is useful) is usually wrong in some subtle way I have to figure out.
294.
by Operyl 4y ago
12/mo (annual pricing) or 15/mo at month to month is definitely more than 10/mo.
295.
by Operyl 4y ago
Agreed, I feel like my limit was 5 bucks. I get good suggestions that help me prevent repetitive patterns but I don’t get any useful “give me code that does X” as advertised.
296.
by Operyl 4y ago
I guess it depends. If you scale up and down via the API and can’t access the API .. you have a pretty good chance of a down scenario if you had a traffic spike you can’t scale for.
297.
by Operyl 4y ago
I think we might be confused, originally the title was not “ The Day The Standard Library Died” on HN. dang changed it back to that title. It was a completely different title, submitted originally: “ "It is currently faster to launch P
298.
by Operyl 4y ago
In the case of HN, it’s explicitly against submission guidelines and frowned upon.
299.
by Operyl 4y ago
Editorialized title, please keep the original titles!
300.
by Operyl 4y ago
Another reason it might not work is you might hit WAFs that block your requests with a captcha/browser check since you’ll be hitting a lot of these rather quickly.

More ›