OJFord

42 ms·

901.
by OJFord 1y ago
1 is why I said or an equivalent - you could do the same with pidgin or any creole or, I don't know if this is a PC way to say it, but any kind of 'hood' or 'ghetto' type slang. The joke is just person is 'flue
902.
by OJFord 1y ago
Don't read too much into my only vague awareness (or person I responded to's unawareness) - I think I've seen one Iron Man film, or maybe only bits of it even. I'm just not into all that Marvel/DC/superhero stu
903.
by OJFord 1y ago
I think it's a (fictional) AI assistant in Iron Man.
904.
by OJFord 1y ago
I would expect that survey to be biased towards more Windows users, if anything.
905.
by OJFord 1y ago
You're just moving the goalposts now; it didn't end until 2022, and what I was responding to was the suggestion that there's no inherent problem with British content, it just needs to be on modern streaming platforms: yes, an
906.
by OJFord 1y ago
Peaky Blinders on Netflix was made (and also broadcast) by the BBC.
907.
by OJFord 1y ago
You think they'd do the jive bit (or an equivalent)? Closest I'd expect would be gen whatever slang with the yeeting sigmas to Ohio etc.
908.
by OJFord 1y ago
UK. Also ublock origin - wouldn't be the first time I'd encountered a pay'wall' that flimsy! (Firefox reading mode used to defeat quite a lot of them.)
909.
by OJFord 1y ago
> A CEO force-merging a change to production would indeed be an "unauthorized action circumventing established processes" by exact words. Of course it would, but I wouldn't expect this post to follow it, especially at a
910.
by OJFord 1y ago
Yes it's a very clear day today, lovely weather. Oh you meant the topic in thread? Fair enough, but it wasn't clear.
911.
by OJFord 1y ago
It wouldn't be taught here either, it's a colloquialism/corruption, whether from American influence or not. Long may you keep it (and so many other things) out of Indian English!
912.
by OJFord 1y ago
Yup, same, hence my (oh so offensive, apparently) comment asking the reason, assuming it must be something else.
913.
by OJFord 1y ago
Wasn't for me, as I said.
914.
by OJFord 1y ago
Wasn't for me, as I said.
915.
by OJFord 1y ago
Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
916.
by OJFord 1y ago
Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem.
917.
by OJFord 1y ago
Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
918.
by OJFord 1y ago
First I'm hearing of it all, but no, that's clear conspiracy theory territory, Musk makes some intervention like that and then X AI publishes TFA about the 'unauthorised' action 'circumventing' established proc
919.
by OJFord 1y ago
The submitted isn't paywalled or down, are you expecting something to happen to it?
920.
by OJFord 1y ago
It's often proscribed, many style guides say 'the company is / has ', sort of de-personifying it to the entity rather than the people that work there. I think it's an Americanizm to say e.g. 'Apple have rele
921.
by OJFord 1y ago
You would have to say ' which has', but then yes it works (and is more correct than 'who have').
922.
by OJFord 1y ago
A lot less than what/where your market & investors are.
923.
by OJFord 1y ago
It's the biggest (0.7%) since the same quarter last year (0.9%).
924.
by OJFord 1y ago
To be clear, I can name tonnes of B2B SaaS in (and well beyond) that realm. I was replying firmly in the 'B2C' scope of the parent comment 'B2C @ $50/month from an unknown company'.
925.
by OJFord 1y ago
TFA doesn't hide or sensationalise that, makes the point that it's timely.
926.
by OJFord 1y ago
Even a known company! I can't name a SaaS that does. It's in the realm of telecom/utility bills.
927.
by OJFord 1y ago
Not GP but the linked Wikipedia page says though there's a private shuttle it's difficult to get into town on foot, so I'd guess it's concern that it'd be annoyingly secluded/disconnected at times.
928.
by OJFord 1y ago
A shame really, since it would be fun to have gov.ca (Canada) and ca.gov (California, US).
929.
by OJFord 1y ago
I would think of it as the whole embedding concept again on a finer grained scale: you wouldn't say the model 'has a dimension of whether the input is king', instead the embedding expresses the idea of 'king' with f
930.
by OJFord 1y ago
Uh, compute power? Storage?

More ›