NullCharacter

7 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by NullCharacter 11y ago

   I might be able to bite on full name/address (considering it's what you'd see on an envelope) but the context is important. The fact that Person A sent a letter to Person B on this can be considered "just" metadata.
2. 62.▲
   by NullCharacter 11y ago

   I know that's what he's trying to do but the comparison isn't really accurate so his sardonic attempt at commentary falls on its face a bit.
3. 63.▲
   by NullCharacter 11y ago

   How is full name, address, credit card information, and private pictures and messages considered "just metadata"? Nothing about that is metadata.
4. 64.▲
   by NullCharacter 11y ago

   And be sure to link me the post please.
5. 65.▲
   by NullCharacter 11y ago

   You're absolutely right. Legally there is absolutely no difference between busting pedophiles on Tor and busting "whistleblowers" talking to the press, legally speaking. No difference. It's legally the exact same.
6. 66.▲
   by NullCharacter 11y ago

   Cute cynicism, but you elect representatives who in turn appoint people to positions of authority. That's how this works. The laws are created and managed by people put into power by the governed. I understand that may go against you
7. 67.▲
   by NullCharacter 11y ago

   Er, no, since the whole HT leak happened within the last two weeks and this operation took place mostly between 2014 and early 2015. You give the Government wayyyy too much credit if you think it can go from leaked exploit to arrests genera
8. 68.▲
   by NullCharacter 11y ago

   facepalm
9. 69.▲
   by NullCharacter 11y ago

   You do realize that's a joke, right? It's not real. Directly from the source: <!-- Get over it, this is a parody and joke -->