NoboruWataya

74 ms·

1111.
by NoboruWataya 5y ago
I feel like he came up with a very clever post title first and then had to write a post to go with it.
1112.
by NoboruWataya 5y ago
This is a great game - my first thought when I played it was that it was quite unique, though since it's a clone of another game I guess that's not exactly true. It is, at least, quite different to most of the RTS I have played (l
1113.
by NoboruWataya 5y ago
To me, "Catastrophe" also removes the burden of action by framing climate change as a fait accompli. It makes it sound like something that has already happened and now we need to deal with the consequences, rather than something w
1114.
by NoboruWataya 5y ago
It doesn't even work right now - the rules that enabled that structure have already been phased out.
1115.
by NoboruWataya 5y ago
I'm not sure that's true - or rather, I think it's exaggerated. First, truth is generally a defence to defamation, and costs follow the cause in the UK so a losing party would generally be required to pay both parties' c
1116.
by NoboruWataya 5y ago
It seems misleading for the headline to talk about "damages" when the case settled. "Damages" to me suggests court-ordered compensation.
1117.
by NoboruWataya 5y ago
Each individual meme or video might not be important, but then I don't think future historians are going to spend much time studying individual artifacts in detail in the same way that current historians do. We live in the age of big d
1118.
by NoboruWataya 5y ago
> just to protect themselves To protect themselves from the public . Whether it's because consumers might take their business (and their data) elsewhere in disgust at what a particular platform is turning into, or because democrati