NitpickLawyer

75 ms·

1. 1591.▲
   by NitpickLawyer 2y ago

   Then, given the fact that both you and Mistral LLC modify the program in the exact same way, that portion still holds. People view weights as an intended obfuscation by the party releasing it. It is not! In fact, it is equally as hard for t
2. 1592.▲
   by NitpickLawyer 2y ago

   This is the greatest misconception in this field. Weights are not a binary form! In fact you can't "run" the weights as they are. They only represent some fixed values. Whenever you use an LLM you "load" the weigh
3. 1593.▲
   by NitpickLawyer 2y ago

   Right now I'd prioritise compute over anything, because it allows for more experiments, and some of those experiments might turn out to be the key to better models (either specific applications or overall generalist models). Meta did t
4. 1594.▲
   by NitpickLawyer 2y ago

   > Would you say the binary is open source? Great question. Is the assembly code in a git, with an open source license? Then yes! It's open source! Think about it this way: just because someone wrote hello world in c and then a compi
5. 1595.▲
   by NitpickLawyer 2y ago

   > Wow, an actual open source language model I find it funny that the AI field has somehow normalised the goalpost moving from capabilities all the way to definitions about open source. And people seem really tribal about it... There abso