Nikker

7 ms·

31.
by Nikker 14y ago
I'm guessing the washrooms in your area don't have sanitary paper(toilet paper).
32.
by Nikker 14y ago
So you are suggesting that it is out of reach for Google and Apple to publish libraries and frameworks that are optimized for a specific hardware platform (ARM A7 + A15) or is it that since Windows X already optimizes Intel / AMD offerings
33.
by Nikker 14y ago
Let me clarify. When you program for Android/IOS how much of the logic you write is referenced from optimized libraries and how much is your own craft? Now look at the entire Market Place / App Store and figure how many of those apps entir
34.
by Nikker 14y ago
I completely agree with performance per watt Intel is on the path to be where they need to be but ARM is on path to be par with a chip that even AMD's x86 offerings can't touch on a core by core basis. Now with Microsoft's Windows 8 trying
35.
by Nikker 14y ago
Maybe 3 decades after it was released according to this paper; http://scholar.google.ca/scholar_url?hl=en&q=http://59.1... Even if the NSA appointed S-Boxes did improve Lucifer then decreasing the block size does not really improve o
36.
by Nikker 14y ago
Since many of these procedures are implemented in hardware directly, maybe it could be utilized as a conditional fall-back? An example might be a MITM attack that indicates an invalid hand shake or shows that an insufficient random pool is
37.
by Nikker 14y ago
Don't forget that IBM actually designed Lucifer which was 128bits but it was the (edit:s/NSA/NHIS) that truncated it to 56bits and named it DES. So maybe this is an example of "6 of one or half a dozen of the other"?
38.
by Nikker 14y ago
This sounds like it would likely be a Trademark infringement suit, which would be expected. Trademarks, if unprotected can lose their value. Having showing it on 100+ million of your devices should meet that requirement.
39.
by Nikker 14y ago
I think I see your point but you have to admit you haven't really established a foundation for your argument. You seem to feel (and I may be wrong of course) that one person selecting a fairly secure pass phrase once would be much more sec
40.
by Nikker 14y ago
Cryptography in it's own principals are based on probability. If ignoring physical access attacks, social engineering attacks, etc are acceptable to you then yes, you can keep a "good" password for a long time. You also have to accept tha
41.
by Nikker 14y ago
With the talent Microsoft hires vs their products the ratio always came out so low I just shook my head. I always pictured a day of work at Microsoft as someone holding a chair over a grad students head making them refactor sol.exe
42.
by Nikker 14y ago
And Farmville needs to know that same information? Or is it Farmville Dr.?
43.
by Nikker 14y ago
Owning and operating a business does as well. If you don't recruit the best you can for your company then indeed the risk is quite high.
44.
by Nikker 14y ago
You should probably know that before you start dealing with a prospective employee. If you are hiring quality people then it is definitely worth it. If you don't know for sure then you should not be hiring anyone.