NhanH

124 ms·

1171.
by NhanH 13y ago
That's not neccessary true. Take for example, in the case where the proof shows that resulting ciphertext would be indistinguishable from a random function, so the adversary would have 1/2^n (with n = key length, 128/192&#x2F
1172.
by NhanH 13y ago
But, exactly what is the risk that employees take (no sarcasm intended)? I mean, let's say an early employee takes 20% less salary than a later one for the first year or two. Additionally, take into account the fact that the company i
1173.
by NhanH 13y ago
Thanks, the answer is great. However, with that plan, wouldn't the first layer employee has ~ 100-200 times more equity than the last layer? Would this cause some sort of division within the employees in the company?
1174.
by NhanH 13y ago
Yes, but in a good way, generally it's far stronger than our common sense idea of "secure".
1175.
by NhanH 13y ago
I'm not sure if this is an appropriate question to ask, but you're the only one in the comments (so far) that say 1% is a reasonable number for the 1st employee. As someone who know nothing about the norm, do you mind explaining w
1176.
by NhanH 13y ago
Regardless of whether they might catch those people in some other ways or not, the rate of 2000/32mil is just too low. Of course, this could mean either that the base rate of such crime is low, or the system is ineffective. Either way
1177.
by NhanH 13y ago
Thanks. I guess in that case "popular" would be a more accurate description, rather than "positive", isn't it?
1178.
by NhanH 13y ago
The news wasn't clear, and I couldn't find the actual papers. But what does "positive" and "negative" mean? Does "positive" means "similar to one's belief", just positivity in general (
1179.
by NhanH 13y ago
The problem: you can just rephrase the claim to have a positive statement. Now, If I'm to claim that the FISA is NOT effective in their role, and the burden of proof would be on you.
1180.
by NhanH 13y ago
Chaos theory [1] will make sure that any minor change will result in drastically different result, so assumptions and guesses won't be sufficient. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory
1181.
by NhanH 13y ago
"Is your view that that we have evolved for the ordinary state of consciousness a view that was made and evaluated in an ordinary state of consciousness? Should its worth be evaluated in an ordinary state of consciousness? How should w
1182.
by NhanH 13y ago
Just to play devil's advocate here, I can claim that our ordinary state of consciousness is the most legitimate one (the one that is closest to reality, if there is such thing as objective reality), or at the very least the most useful
1183.
by NhanH 13y ago
Know the space, as in know the experience of using one, or did you mean knowing the geological space of the location so they can physically stop you from doing silly thing? (Just out of curiosity, as I have no idea how one act under influen
1184.
by NhanH 13y ago
As a young 20-ish who've never partaken in any kind of drugs. Does anyone have a NEGATIVE story to share? Not the type of "he got addicted and ruined his life" but "hallucinations after all are just hallucinations, and t
1185.
by NhanH 13y ago
"but it's fairly representative in that it's something of a goal within the system rather than an external benefit." But if the system allows us to achieve some desirable goal, why would it need to have any external bene
1186.
by NhanH 13y ago
But the mental impact comes from perceiving the direct impact on physical well being, incorrectly or otherwise. In other words, if individuals believe (and alieve) that the risk of physical danger is so infinitesimal small, there would be n
1187.
by NhanH 13y ago
>> Working on search or data classification technology that has applications to obsoleting workers and putting them out of a job = not evil? Possibly, if that technology also allows us to, says, cure cancer? Hyperbole aside, putting w
1188.
by NhanH 13y ago
As a non-native English speaker, I have quite some trouble writing an email with proper etiquette. I'm not quite sure HOW to write a one-liner email question (shouldn't I introduce myself, provide context, isn't it rude to as
1189.
Why metadata should be private too [pdf](papers.ssrn.com)
1 points by NhanH 13y ago|0 comments
1190.
by NhanH 13y ago
That's actually a different one, and I believe not one that the phrase "life is suffering" means. I'm not a Buddhist or an expert in Buddhism by any mean. But being born and raised in an South East Asian that is strongly
1191.
by NhanH 13y ago
If he is indeed a spy, then the Americans have TWO problems to deal with. And it has absolutely no bearing on the current privacy discussion - the two problems are damaging in two (relatively) different aspects.
1192.
by NhanH 13y ago
The starting left side panel that shows all the supported command is quite useful for someone that is learning. However, it's either blocked by the demo screen at the start. Or it would be cleared every time a tutorial is chosen, and it doe
1193.
by NhanH 14y ago
To my understanding, Go is meant to be a replacement for C, while Scala supposedly would be roughly in the same position on the technology stack as Ruby/ Python/ Java (and this is a broad generalization as well). I'm not sure how Go will be
1194.
by NhanH 14y ago
There are a couple of points I'd have to disagree with you. - Firstly, I'd bet that several report options, especially the "unskilled player" one, are just placebo that do nothing, and provides the upset player a scapegoat to fire on, witho
1195.
by NhanH 14y ago
Mostly it's confusing when advices of the type "do this" and "don't do this" are mixed together. For example, slide 64 and second line of 89 seems to contradict each other, or the "don't be an asshole" but "it's alright to be a dick" one.
1196.
by NhanH 14y ago
The way it was explained in the infographic wasn't clear. But what he meant is that between P(X = accountant) and P(X = accountant and plumber), the former is bigger. The fact that P(X = plumber) > P(X = accountant) is irrelevant, as we
1197.
by NhanH 14y ago
The problem is that death is permanent, or irreversible, as you said. And that things change. If there exists an omniscience being that can factually answer the question of "Will I ever achieve my dreams?" (or "Will I ever be happy again?",