Nextgrid

10 ms·

181.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
You can do this easier with Wake on LAN. See https://danielpgross.github.io/friendly_neighbor/howto-sleep... for prior art.
182.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
204 has weird behavior in Safari and Firefox for example. Entering a URL returning 204 in the URL bar will not change the URL bar to it, leaving its contents to whatever was there before. Similarly if you click on it it would not actually
183.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
"SEO spammers being more advanced than multi-billion-dollar search conglomerate" is a myth. Spam sites have an obvious objective: display ads, shill affiliate links or sell products. All these have to be visible, since an ad or pr
184.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
That's not wrong - the apartment I'm in currently has trash containers near the entrance that of course weren't present in the promotional material.
185.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
Why is it addressing it? It'll just lead to every single ad having this statement. To address it you actually need to force them to provide the originals alongside the edited pictures.
186.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
Every company and their dog is saying that LLMs/"AI" is supposed to be that magic fairy anytime now.
187.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
> someone finally made Poland -filter The UK is feeling left out and would like a word.
188.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
Network operators have zero reason to care, they get paid per the GB for the bandwidth.
189.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
That's already the case (irrespective of residential proxies) because content only serves as bait for someone to hand over personal information (during signup/login) and then engage with ads. Proxies actually help with that by f
190.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
LLMs aren't a good indicator of success here because an LLM trained on 80% of the data is just as good as one trained on 100%, assuming the type/category of data is distributed evenly. Proxies help when you do need to get access t
191.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
Spam in Google search results is due to Google happily taking money from the spammers in exchange for promoting their spam, or that the spam sites benefit Google indirectly by embedding Google Ads/Analytics. I don't see any spam i
192.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
There's an oxygen waster whose salary is conditional on bringing this data in. Whether that covers his paycheck, let alone brings profit is irrelevant to him. He is also the one responsible for reporting the profit numbers on that, s
193.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
Clawdbot -> Moltbot -> Openclaw.
194.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
> hard problems are best solved by breaking them down into smaller, easier sub-problems I'm ok doing that with a junior developer because they will learn from it and one day become my peer. LLMs don't learn from individual inte
195.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
I fly often and I think the airport hate is overblown. Airports are designed to keep large groups of passengers moving as efficiently as possible, and as a result they need to make some tradeoffs. Airports aren't and shouldn't r
196.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
> Is it that HSBC has 0 competent people who could have mentioned Given the salaries, tooling and working conditions for tech people in such companies, why would anyone competent work there?
197.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
But even if that was the case, is there any value for a receiver to be receiving those? Surely those messages would be picked up by a receiver closer to the transmitter anyway. I think the value in spoofing rejection is greater than the pro
198.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
Surely the receiver would run plausibility checks on the received messages and reject spoofed locations that are physically impossible to receive by said receiver?
199.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
> what happens if you onboard a superstar that works with django some other way If you hired a "superstar" that goes out of their way to hand-write migrations in cases where Django can do it by default (the majority of them) yo
200.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
Patreon is a very niche app in the grand scheme of things. There's the saying that only 1% of web visitors ever stop by and actually contribute , and I'd expect that number to drop to 0.001% when it comes to contributing monetari
201.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
> the GDPR penalty is a highish percentage of the company's total revenue which gives the laws a good amount of "teeth" Under 2% of GDPR complaints even result in fines. And that would require there to be grounds for a com
202.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
There is no such thing as a talent storage - it's always a pay storage.
203.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/concepts/pydantic_settings/
204.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
Secure Boot and TPM are separate things. The current Secure Boot policy gets measured by the TPM but that's about it.
205.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
Then you reset the firmware and re-enroll your SB keys or disable it completely.
206.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
> you cannot use unsigned drivers because the kernel can detect and activate the lockdown mode You don't need to load a driver; you can just replace a binary that's going to be executed as root as part of system boot. This is s
207.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
Yes, you can . I really don't want to be in the business of building OSes. If these guys make it so that getting reasonable boot security is a simple toggle, I'd be grateful.
208.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
> the kernel will verify anything beneath it Yes that's the case - my argument is that Linux currently doesn't have anything standardized to do that. Your best bet for now is to use a read-only dm-verity-protected volume as the
209.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
A full trusted boot chain allows you to use a reboot to revert back to a trusted state after suspected runtime compromise.
210.
by Nextgrid 8mo ago
Secure Boot only extends the chain of trust from your firmware down the first UEFI binary it loads. Currently SB is effectively useless because it will at best authenticate your kernel but the initrd and subsequent userspace (including prog

More ›