NewsaHackO

6 ms·

61.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
>It takes multiple seconds to launch, Yes, this is the ubiquitous memory issue that I mentioned. Unfortunately, it is now the baseline in all modern apps. >random lines disappear in the scroll back, it’s internal state gets messed up
62.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
How are Anthropic's production applications poor quality? Other than memory use (which unfortunately is the industry standard nowadays) Claude Code is pretty solid.
63.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
The issue is that the legal system is retroactive, and information that is made public cannot be retracted. If a random company gets your sensitive data and disseminates it to the world, then sure, they will face legal repercussions, but th
64.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
I don't think they can, at least if they are making an argument for why the Defense Production Act should not apply to them. Their original argument is that they will not help with anything that is unconstitutional, such as the unlawfu
65.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
source?
66.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
You (and me) commented on it, which is the journalist's main purpose of writing headlines like these.
67.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
Huh
68.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
OK, that is relevant context, because the quotes that people are saying he plagiarized wouldn't make sense to count as plagiarism in a physics thesis. I was scratching my head, thinking of how he could have plagiarized Camus in a physi
69.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
Why after thier IPO?
70.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
I think one time I asked opus about copyfail when it just came out and it did treat me like some sort of criminal, but are there really people that run into this on a regular basis other than cybersecurity experts (which cannot be a big eno
71.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
I do not agree that the concept of writing can be considered a specific tool at all. Maybe a pencil, but writing opposed to remembering everything is a more substantial level of a paradigm shift than AI use is.
72.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
This is like a smoker that lives to 100 saying that he had no increased risk of developing lung cancer because he didn’t at 100.
73.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
It has to be sort of impressive, given that you tried so hard to use it instead of the regular Opus.
74.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
I guess the issue is that when someone can't use a product immediately, they have an urge to abandon it altogether, not learn how to use it.
75.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
The personalized algorithm is not the root issue though. The root issue is that social media sites live by increasing engagement of its viewers. Because of this, they all get away from the original stated purpose of bringing people together
76.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
Yes, just because it is uncomfortable for them to realize, doesn't make it not true. Words have meanings.
77.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
Do you have any actual examples of documents where it did not work?
78.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
>doesn’t seem to be replicating documents all too well based on the many other testimonies in these comments Ironic, that you are agreeing with a post saying they put in little effort for the implementation when you have put in absolutel
79.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
Why do you say it doesn't work? It seems to work fine for the feature parity they claim.
80.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
I agree. To each their own, but the UI updating automatically doesn't really add much value to me. I would prefer that the view I am seeing is a snapshot in time of what the ground truth server was, not some mixed state that forces me
81.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
>will categorically reject AI-made metal on principle. I think this is a huge part of the reason people sometimes find AI criticism so dismissible; there is always some factor other than the actual product it seems that AI-made assets ar
82.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
Has there been any real, major attacks using prompt injection?
83.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
Why can't you just post the list as a comment?
84.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
Did actually expect people to read the article before commenting?
85.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
Yeah, I honestly feel like some sources should be banned if they regularly editorialize titles like this. FT wants to sell subs by any means necessary, even if it means creating some clearly misleading titles to do so. By amplifying their r
86.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
so 250 million people? Thats a good amount of people.
87.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
No, but in a peace time, it's a lot easier to convince someone not to use nukes than in a war when the party who has nukes has its back against the wall.
88.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
A lot of people are face blind (including me), and it's extremely embarrassing, especially when I'm supposed to remember a person's name. Wouldn't wear survialiance tech to try to fix it though.
89.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
I think that has to do more with the thinking "train of thought" that some models show as what the model is processing before making the response. There shouldn't be a distillation risk with actually asking the model to expla
90.
by NewsaHackO 4mo ago
Yeah, I feel as though people have seen the error of creating a free internet and are trying as much as possible to reverse it. It's kind of like how Photoshop (and most software companies honestly) have seen how selling a license in p

More ›