Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
NewJazz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
331.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Prosecuting criminals.
332.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Probably because people are going via SFO when they might otherwise go via Oakland or elsewhere.
333.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
I could write a much more complicated list of steps for github.
334.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Opening ssh to the internet is fine if you are using key based auth, which is the default on many VM setups.
335.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Because the user sees no difference in experience.
336.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Yeah, but ooh boy is a private gitlab server complicated. Omnibus installation helps manage that, but if you outgrow it you're in for a complicated time. Also gitlab has cves like every other week... You're going to be on that upg
337.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Do most vps providers enable password based ssh access on first boot up? That video doesn't seem very relatable.
338.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
And before that it said... but if you're just looking for a generic place to put your code projects that aren't necessarily intended for public release and support (ie. random automation scripts, scraps of concepts that never rea
339.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Not trying to be dismissive/snarky... But why?
340.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
I wasn't proposing a full on forge, just a VM with a (key auth only) ssh server to push code to/from.
341.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
I think both of you are misunderstanding what I proposed. You just need a single VM with an ssh server. Literally no web service needed, if all you want to do is host some code remotely.
342.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Unfortunately I don't think there's really an answer to that conundrum that doesn't involve just spinning up your own git server and accepting all the operational overhead that comes with it. Hmm all that operational overhe
343.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
"Please think like a developer" lmao if I said this to someone at my dayjob I'd be gone.
344.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
But it isn't a feature, so using a feature flag is a bit weird.
345.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Are you spelling it with two vs on purpose?
346.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
You failed to answer the question. Why did you reply?
347.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Honestly what I really want is the latter (mutable references), but pointing to aliases that I own and update manually (the former).
348.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
It seems they did end up contracting with Sygnia
349.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Yeah if the volt was released a decade earlier they'd have been a frontrunner in the pure ev space in the late 2010s.
350.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
The us govt literally tried carrots (tax credits) and now the new administration is threatening owners with sticks (absurdly high national registration fees). Oh, and everyone who couldn't afford an EV complained about the subsidies. T
351.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Wait didn't they have a NiMH battery too?
352.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
* no ipv6 support * no ff merge support * no sha2 commit hash support
353.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
And LLMs will get retrained eventually. So writing one good spec and a great harness (or multiple) might be enough, eventually.
354.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
A framework is different than a paradigm shift or new language.
355.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Yes... Any more context? Were they leaking data?
356.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Then why do they hard code the trivy version and create PRs to bump it? https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy-action/blob/57a97c7e78... https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy-action/p
357.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
They did a lot of what you describe, although perhaps not well enough.
358.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
I'm pretty sure the trivy action does not do that.
359.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Does this work well with fleets? I remember looking at this early on it seemed fairly single-server focused.
360.
▲
by
NewJazz
7mo ago
Quite relevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn
More ›