Nemo_bis

29 ms·

1. 391.▲
   by Nemo_bis 7y ago

   They do: http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Library_published_journals
2. 392.▲
   by Nemo_bis 8y ago

   archive.org is fine.
3. 393.▲
   by Nemo_bis 8y ago

   The freedom definition doesn't have such a requirement though. Sometimes it allows to prohibit some usages, e.g. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicens...
4. 394.▲
   by Nemo_bis 8y ago

   There was such a need for ownCloud, where the company and main maintainers pushed developers to not develop things in core which would compete with their proprietary extensions. https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/e
5. 395.▲
   by Nemo_bis 8y ago

   And what level of integration makes an "addition to the product"? The problem is where you draw the line.
6. 396.▲
   by Nemo_bis 8y ago

   Your problem is probably with distribution and distribution in modified form, i.e. freedoms 2 and 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software#Definition_and_t... You don't need to distribute or license the soft
7. 397.▲
   by Nemo_bis 8y ago

   "It's only some enterprise modules." Sure, ownCloud said the same and eventually forced its own founder to fork and make Nextcloud under AGPL. Good luck with that. Did you completely fail to learn from experience, or are you
8. 398.▲
   by Nemo_bis 8y ago

   The Redis protocol uses TCP connections, pretty much the perfect case for AGPL which deals with "interacting with it remotely through a computer network" etc. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html Sure, inte