Navarr

70 ms·

751.
by Navarr 14y ago
I understand, but I believe as others have pointed out that ICANN would deny said applications. And if the spammers/scammers have enough money to afford the infrastructure necessary for a TLD, I think we may have a bigger problem.
752.
by Navarr 14y ago
This is a bad example only because .ac.uk is technically a second-level domain, and anything under it would be a third-level subdomain of .ac.uk Technically speaking, of course.
753.
by Navarr 14y ago
No, you'd still have to scour the web for each individual library of tags. Since they require the .register() on the page, from what I understand. Though your last part, with <require /> is fascinating and would greatly improve thi
754.
by Navarr 14y ago
While I considered this approach to be plausible at first glance, it isn't. For the tags to work for your users, they would also have to visit the registry for that tag.
755.
by Navarr 14y ago
The steps seem pretty dishonest to me. Correct me if i'm wrong, but these are the real X-Tag steps: 1. Scour the web for a plugin 2. Add the plugin script include to your page 3. Copy/Type the new HTML tag 4. Customise the plugin with your
756.
by Navarr 14y ago
That doesn't make it a bad thing. When did marketing depend on search engines? Search Engines aren't the end all be all.
757.
by Navarr 14y ago
The point of a domain name is an easy to remember address. Not a guessing game. Not an easy to guess address. I'm not even sure how you came to that conclusion based on what I said. Multiple domain names (like book et al) will hopefully b
758.
by Navarr 14y ago
While that's true, it's probably because gov and edu domains are strictly regulated. I could imagine google giving higher priority to .book addresses, provided that (a) the user was searching for a book and (b) .book addresses required that
759.
by Navarr 14y ago
They probably wouldn't bother trying to guess. And I honestly don't see that as a bad thing. I rarely guess domain names. If I don't know the address, I search it. I expect most normal people search it even if they do know the address.
760.
by Navarr 14y ago
Yes, well, at least in Android backwards compatibility means something.
761.
You complain about Android Fragmentation?(tech.navarr.me)
2 points by Navarr 14y ago|2 comments
762.
by Navarr 14y ago
I didn't bother to read the terms of API use. I'm not using the API ^^;; I'm simply using their embeddable video player and changing the height and width to a form more appropriate for desired usage.
763.
Show HN: Rewrote backend for my YouTube Audio Player from Scratch(navarr.me)
4 points by Navarr 14y ago|2 comments
764.
by Navarr 14y ago
New business model: Kickstarter for songs.
765.
by Navarr 14y ago
Just out of curiosity, in what countries is it "Tyre"? Can any HNer's fill me in?
766.
Why yawning is contagious(youtu.be)
8 points by Navarr 14y ago|4 comments
767.
Show HN: YouTube Audio Player(gtaero.net)
4 points by Navarr 14y ago|1 comments
768.
Ask HN: DBMS 'Timestamp' or Unix Epoch as an Integer?
1 points by Navarr 14y ago|3 comments
769.
by Navarr 14y ago
You don't have to buy an Android phone to debug Android webkit. Just get the toolkit and run the emulator. (Which is a bit slow unless you install an x86 image and Intel HAXM). The same applies for Apple, you just have to download their S
770.
by Navarr 14y ago
Something that should've been incredibly clear here is that square required money be available as backup in the event that there was a disputed claim. SAYING that you'll fund it from elsewhere is not the same as doing so. And they said th
771.
by Navarr 14y ago
I read over this and all I can think is that OP didn't do what he should've. Their process of pulling in funds when you have a negative balance is automated. (check) He said he'd fund it from another source, but as far as I read (got really
772.
by Navarr 15y ago
This is the entire point of Google Latitude existing. (But I like your idea too! Very useful)
773.
by Navarr 15y ago
These are revokable, and don't allow access to change your password.
774.
by Navarr 15y ago
FTP has been working perfectly for the last 40 years, why do we need SFTP? Just because something WORKS doesn't mean it works WELL. Making an Asynchronous email protocol would not be difficult. We can do it. Everyone talking about re-inv
775.
by Navarr 15y ago
No but you DO need a new protocol for the mess that is mime types in emails, and the two popular open access protocols IMAP and POP - which are atrocious.
776.
by Navarr 15y ago
> You send a message and it either goes where it’s supposed to, or you get an error message back. That’s it, that’s email. It’s simple. It works. Except when you DON'T. Except when the mail server is broken, except when the error mess
777.
by Navarr 15y ago
I like this. This seems like a good temporary fix before one of us finally breaks down and creates a good email protocol that takes the uses of modern email into account; as well as a webclient and server for that protocol. Mayhaps I'll ha
778.
by Navarr 15y ago
The first ten times I saw this article I ignored it. Now I'm glad I didn't. From now on, I won't ignore unlucky headlines.
779.
by Navarr 15y ago
I guess that's the /other/ issue with a lack of an API. If you know a secure way of getting credentials please advise. All the source is open, and it literally comes in and goes out. Nothing logged etc.
780.
by Navarr 15y ago
Unfortunately I'm having plenty of problems getting this to work as opposed to when I originally hacked everything together. Google has been upping their security so now things like http://support.google.com/accounts/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#

More ›