Nadya

82 ms·

511.
by Nadya 9y ago
This is nothing you couldn't already do in Javascript with a simple <div> and some code. The dialogue element just gets rid of some of the boilerplate HTML and implements some common functions you'd use for such a modal popu
512.
by Nadya 9y ago
I'm also one of those people. When it runs code to detect if it is a virus, you have to trust the sandboxing and frankly I've yet to see a sandbox that at some point hasn't been taken control of and exploited (this goes for w
513.
by Nadya 9y ago
Think of it as shorthand for a list that expands to be infinitely large. [0] People would consider a blacklist that includes ` * .example.com` to be a list that contains all potential subdomains of `example.com`. With ` * ` being seen as sh
514.
by Nadya 9y ago
>Check context, and restrict access But then why do you need the blacklist? I refer to this post by vec: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16208419 If you think you need a blacklist you should probably be using a wh
515.
by Nadya 9y ago
Functionally - yes. By definition - no. A blacklist won't allow items that match and a whitelist only allows items that match. Blacklists include by default and whitelists exclude by default. Since the regex needs to match to be includ
516.
by Nadya 9y ago
I feel just posting the ingredients list is a bit misinforming as it would appear to be mostly sugar. For those who may be unaware - ingredients lists are supposed to be in order of most->least used ingredients. So 2 of the top 4 ingredi
517.
by Nadya 9y ago
Mozilla is the only holdout on this issue AFAIK. Safari and Edge will show the punycode and Chrome 58+ has fixed it as well. The URL is not even visually identical due to the dot underneath the letter `d`. Seems to be this unicode character
518.
by Nadya 9y ago
You're correct, I've only been a Prime customer for as long as it's been $99 annually, which was sometime in 2014 [0]. However, they've still added more to what Prime membership includes since that time so my statement r
519.
by Nadya 9y ago
Only true without grandfathered pricing or with actual price increases. I've paid the same price for Prime as when I first bought into it, even as additional items have been added for what I have been paying. My example is more like: I
520.
by Nadya 9y ago
But it's all shades of gray. While you might like Prime Video - others may find it useless but enjoy the free Kindle books or Twitch discounts or other included offers. Personally, I order enough things throughout a year that Prime pay
521.
by Nadya 9y ago
Others seem to misunderstand your point. Essentially you want someone with deep knowledge. To share an example... "Deep C" - by Olve Maudal [0]. It isn't about writing bad code - it's about understanding how the code w
522.
by Nadya 9y ago
In theory, content would not be delivered until the ads have been fetched and reported that they've been delivered. In practice, that isn't a realistic option. Not because it isn't technically possible - but because people ar
523.
by Nadya 9y ago
That isn't how the internet works. It's a series of requests and at any point some requests can be rejected. Whether that request was critical for site functionality depends on what request that was. Consenting to requests from go
524.
by Nadya 9y ago
Did you read their post? They didn't say selectively paywall.
525.
by Nadya 9y ago
>No. Those other perspectives are just as valid, if not more. As far as the business is concerned - not really. To the individuals? Well... this is why there is such a divide depending which perspective someone takes... it's a &qu
526.
by Nadya 9y ago
Oh - I agree a reasonable stock buy-back is the better alternative option with a better result for most relationships. >I challenge you to find an attorney that would advise her to sign any such post-nup. You couldn't as there&#x2
527.
by Nadya 9y ago
Agree + Stay together ; Agree + Divorce ; Disagree + Stay Together ; Disagree + Divorce Only one of these has potential risk to the business and it falls under the "Disagree" options. So for the business, agreement is necessary to
528.
by Nadya 9y ago
From the business perspective (which means completely disregard any personal perspectives/issues that arise) there are four scenarios. Agree + Stay together ; Agree + Divorce ; Disagree + Stay Together ; Disagree + Divorce Only one of
529.
by Nadya 9y ago
>And for what? Because if things go sideways you might lose half? Half of rich is still rich and it's a small risk to take for the chance at a lifelong loving partner. Some things are worth more than money. And if they have no pla
530.
by Nadya 9y ago
Antennas are usually built to 1/2 or 1/4th the size of the wavelength. I'd imagine that's why - but am curious myself if it is something else. It's the only 1/4th fraction that comes to mind.
531.
by Nadya 9y ago
Adblockers are a racket, their business model involves asking advertisers to pony up protection money for exceptions Want to show me where Gorhill asks advertisers to pony up money to be exempt from uBlock Origin? >This is true, but a
532.
by Nadya 9y ago
>The people who never look into the settings probably didn't install the ad blocker themselves in the first place. Not true. Even most people who install an AdBlocker will not change their settings. If you change your settings, you&
533.
by Nadya 9y ago
>There is an opt-out checkbox in the settings. Which should be opt-in. And if nobody wants to opt-in there is the problem; it's going against what the users want. Most people never change default settings of software they instal
534.
by Nadya 9y ago
Practically everything has a Prop 65 warning to the point where it's meaningless and everyone I know ignores it. [0] https://oehha.ca.gov/proposition-65/general-info/proposition...
535.
by Nadya 9y ago
>If you try an Impossible Burger without knowing it's plant-based, you wouldn't notice it's not meat. Bullshit. My mother has tried to pass that product as a hamburger and in a single bite I spat it out and asked her what
536.
by Nadya 9y ago
And the court of public opinion often doesn't consider the law and that's their point. Even if completely justified under the law it can be bad PR. For example, McDonalds could have refused to give St. Jude winnings for one of t
537.
by Nadya 9y ago
It "could be" but it just isn't. The reality of the situation is that minorities are being silenced or told they have "internalized racism" and whenever these actual minorities speak out on the "issue&quo
538.
by Nadya 9y ago
Except in nearly every case, this is the reality of the situation: http://i.imgur.com/erINvSI.png It isn't that the people are offended - it's that others are trying to get offended "on their behalf" as
539.
by Nadya 9y ago
I have a well-maintained, though not perfect library about 800GB in size hosted in a personal "Booru"-style software (MyImouto) with all images tagged. I use it for all of my photos - everything from my personal photography to s
540.
by Nadya 9y ago
>Do you just in your head have to tack on 10 to 20 percent (depending on the context)? Yes - and I actually prefer shopping at places that don't use manipulative ($x.99) pricing or if they do, at least tax has already been include

More ›