My_Name

5 ms·

31.
by My_Name 2mo ago
"Then: Give Claude rules Now: Let Claude use judgement" How about no? I am the one who judges.
32.
by My_Name 3mo ago
>>If we put your brain in a jar, would you be a person? This is very close to the question : Would you still be a person if your arms and legs were amputated, and you could not communicate. I would hope you would see that the answer i
33.
by My_Name 3mo ago
It has been claimed in the past that computers would never think "because they are made of matter" It was a serious statement at the time it was made, but it is clearly ludicrous. Like the universe created special states for arran
34.
by My_Name 3mo ago
Ah, the brain of Perseus. If, as you were replacing neurons, you put them together in the same arrangement in the jar next door so you had 2 exact copes, which one is your brain? At the exact point 50% of your neurons are copied, which one
35.
by My_Name 3mo ago
Ah, the ever present American Exceptionalism. China really does not care what happens within the borders of the US, at least as far as stopping them developing their own models. Make laws, make policy, ban them from US markets. It won'
36.
by My_Name 3mo ago
If the rhythm machines were making the beats, your analogy would be sound. Unfortunately, they do not. AI has already started earning good money in music. The Velvet Sundown, for example was getting a million listens a month on Spotify. Peo
37.
by My_Name 3mo ago
It's like saying that thinking cannot generate new knowledge because all thought is just rearranging the information we get from our senses, or memory of previous information from our senses, and we do nothing more than figure out the
38.
by My_Name 3mo ago
Video here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwA3CuJxbk4
39.
Device in many US cars leaves them open to hacking(wired.com)
6 points by My_Name 3mo ago|1 comments
40.
by My_Name 3mo ago
"Consumers are increasingly turning to platforms like ChatGPT to research and make decisions because traditional searches have been ruined by advertising, so it’s important that we show up to ruin those moments as well"
41.
by My_Name 3mo ago
Ah yes, the eternal golden triangle
42.
by My_Name 3mo ago
"the sentence...is true but unprovable" Personally, I would say that if it cannot be shown to be true or false, it cannot be said to be true (or false). Asking that about that sentence is, to my mind, a category error, like asking
43.
by My_Name 3mo ago
Indeed. Where do you throw your wooden shoes these days? (Not that it was an effective tactic then anyway)
44.
by My_Name 3mo ago
As I say above, here in the UK we used to have the top rate of tax at 95% of your earnings, and it was the period of fastest growth for poor and middle class people (Boomers at the time) Unfortunately, the rich are the ones most capable of
45.
by My_Name 3mo ago
I fully agree. Tax wealth, not work. Then it is far easier to lift yourself from poverty, but harder to hold on to vast amounts of wealth. After WW2, when tax on the wealthy was far greater, sometimes 95% of their income (in the UK at least
46.
by My_Name 3mo ago
It was a sensible, valid and pertinent reply to the parent comment though... As with most comments, context is quite important.
47.
by My_Name 3mo ago
There is a firm opinion in some circles that an AI can never do anything but recombine already known things despite a rising number of cases where that very much appears to be an inaccurate view. Any slim possibility that vital information
48.
by My_Name 3mo ago
I may be the only person responding that see the humour in your post. I thought it was quite funny TBH
49.
by My_Name 3mo ago
Those shows are just shorthand for 'utopian future with no need for money', 'distopian future where corporations have control', 'distopian future where machines have control', 'distopian future where the g
50.
by My_Name 3mo ago
I don't like what AI is doing to the world and the tools it puts into the hands of those who would make the world a worse place, but I don't have my head in the sand about the inevitability of what is about to happen in a lot of f
51.
by My_Name 3mo ago
For font design, and art beyond what could be called boilerplate art, real art, not just something to quickly throw on a website so you have something there, AI is not a good tool. I think AI will take over many jobs, firstly in the arran
52.
by My_Name 3mo ago
There is nothing about a LLM 'sharting out code' that blocks it being reviewed or understood by a human.
53.
by My_Name 3mo ago
You said "they reproduce what they're trained on" The problem was unsolved, it solved it when it was not possible for it to be trained on the solution, therefore your other claim that "they're always going to produc
54.
by My_Name 3mo ago
Not sure what you mean, I have one account. Did someone else express this opinion?
55.
by My_Name 3mo ago
I misremembered. I considered both and settled on Forgejo. It was a while ago now and as Forgejo is a Gitea fork my mind must have conflated remaining hook names (hooks/pre-receive.d/gitea, post-receive.d/gitea, update.d&#x2F
56.
by My_Name 3mo ago
I was referring more to the internet having many fathers...
57.
by My_Name 3mo ago
You seem to not know what UBI is. The U stands for Universal, meaning everyone gets the same. Universal Basic Income, a fixed amount of money everyone gets whether they work or not. Nobody gets 'a larger share' Unlike work, where
58.
by My_Name 3mo ago
I think I got all the information I need to be able to judge that article from seeing that the author calls themselves a "Retrofuturist Software Mender".
59.
by My_Name 3mo ago
I agree. Denial only takes you so far. At some point, the devs that insist on outdated working practices (at least ones the boss regards as such) will be replaced by younger people who either don't know about them, or like their boss,
60.
by My_Name 3mo ago
There have been a few movies that each revolutionised CGI in their own way. The Last Starfighter, flight of the navigator, tron, jurassic park, toy story, Terminator 2

More ›