MrPatan

34 ms·

391.
by MrPatan 5y ago
> Let's imagine someone makes an AI project that can turn requirements into code Developers can't turn requirements into code. Whole teams and companies struggle mightily to turn a partially-understood subset of the requiremen
392.
by MrPatan 5y ago
So go find a coworking space close to you with people seeking the same thing. Then if it turns out the coworking mates are a bunch of jerks, you can switch without wondering if you'll be able to pay rent next month. Seems pretty cool t
393.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Didn't they just said they couldn't sell it (who'd buy?) and they just taking it "off the books" and will just stop claiming the money from the dividends? So now Rosneft gets to keep more money? They did a stock buy
394.
by MrPatan 5y ago
"Thugs with guns could shut it off at any time" is the weirdest criticism of anything I have ever seen. Don't you see it can be said of everything? Just buy some and stop being a hater. It's not early anymore.
395.
by MrPatan 5y ago
I do the same. This is the only way to organize things, by date. I do the same with documents. I don't even want to think about categories, ontologies are always wrong. But today is 2022-02-24, no two ways about it. It's autom
396.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Maybe what needs to be replaced is the meme that people can't deal with hierarchical filesystems. That may have been true 20 years ago when the average person didn't use a computer too much. Is that still true today? Will it be
397.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Any with your own domain, because then you can change the provider later if you make a mistake
398.
by MrPatan 5y ago
> Lexical homogenization is not the same as idea homogenization, It is for the word thinkers.
399.
by MrPatan 5y ago
How about less sun or wind than is necessary, instead of the strawman "no wind or sun"?
400.
by MrPatan 5y ago
And a week of less solar and wind than usage?
401.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Qui bono?
402.
by MrPatan 5y ago
I do front end. It's a waste of time. Pick a common one you like and move on.
403.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Sure, the tech is not perfect. But it will get better over time, not worse. Soon there may be a "good version" of it that replaces a big chunk of anything financial and financializes another chunk of everything else. Or maybe not
404.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Survivor bias. You don't see all the perfectly designed codebases that never went anywhere. We only talk about legacy code because it's the one that pays the bills.
405.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Why, when presented with an article like this, do we discuss the content of it, but seldom why does it exist in the first place? Why would this newspaper want to say these things precisely now? What prompted the editor to pick this story an
406.
by MrPatan 5y ago
You
407.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Tabs are not valid JSON
408.
by MrPatan 5y ago
They'll become an artist
409.
by MrPatan 5y ago
4:26, but there were a lot of commas sometimes...
410.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Yes, the fog of Gell-Mann's amnesia is lifting. It's probably peer to peer communication like this. What would you do before? Send a letter to the editor of the very same news source to tell them they were full of shit?
411.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Just buy some. I know you don't really think climate change is a problem. You drive a car, fly, the whole thing. So just buy crypto and be done with it, please. We're early, but it's getting kinda late, just do it.
412.
by MrPatan 5y ago
> Does the media just love perpetuating a state of constant crisis? Yes, of course. More clicks for little effort. Many other interests are also aligned. No need for a conspiracy, it's just that if you ask a pharma company or a ho
413.
by MrPatan 5y ago
> Opensea NFTs are stored on the Google Cloud Platform Other NFTs are fully on-chain, buy those. This is such a weird argument to make.
414.
by MrPatan 5y ago
> This seems totally opposite of what old people say on their death bed Maybe because nobody is around to listen to, or cares about, the old people saying in their death bed "maybe I should have worked harder"
415.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Just buy some, this is tiresome.
416.
by MrPatan 5y ago
They're using the popular meaning of "science": A claim from an impressive or impressive-sounding person or institution.
417.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Do people think the fix will need a "long march through the institutions" as well? I think we may get lucky and they may have rotten the institutions into irrelevance enough that setting up new ones may work this time. Interestin
418.
by MrPatan 5y ago
But now the question is "is this aesthetic value high enough to sustain the network?". Maybe, maybe not. But it's no longer a mathematical certainty, which is what this paper is about.
419.
by MrPatan 5y ago
Is this the one where he assumes an eventual value of $0? That's the flaw. At a value >0 many people would buy them all purely for the pleasure, the aesthetic value of owning them. So there you go, what gives bitcoin value is art.
420.
by MrPatan 5y ago
And you conveniently danced around the middle step that maybe was important and went right into the absurd one. Maybe you shouldn't be so calm, somebody may be pulling a fast one on you.

More ›