MrOwnPut

27 ms·

271.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
i think there's probably a correlation, sure. will we find adhd & ocd are symptoms of a "puzzle gene"? i don't need an e-diagnosis from a few sentences of mine though, thanks. i know what i make and what others
272.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
in Twitter's case it would be direct accounts with the advertisers. you have to make sure you only show certain companies ads next to certain content, or they will pull out. therefore you need to control the client. only show tier 2 ad
273.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
i agree, except for the scaling, a 10x can make an entire project it takes 100s of engineers for, and they'll do it in magnitudes less code. but that long topic aside... i was just pointing out the ideal environment for "10x progr
274.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
nope, not satire, is yours? you negged and put your opinion down, but you forgot to put down why it's "horrible"! so, until then... yes-huh!
275.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Radar can be supplemental, but it has many false positives. Blind spot monitoring will go off if you pass metal poles a certain way. You could invalidate that false positive with another sensor, probably computer vision, so you should have
276.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
10x programmers aren't going to be good at grinding tickets. they'll procrastinate on them because they are boring and tedious and will go work a massive project instead because it's fun to them. they'll finish that mass
277.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
My understanding is anything more than stereoscopic vision, like lidar, will fail in many conditions like snow/rain so you might as well never rely it. The fact that we can do it with just vision means the computer vision should be a
278.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
There's a lot that goes into showing ads, prebidding, making sure there's no nsfw content, etc. Even if they implemented it correctly you wouldn't really trust a 3rd party to show your ads and risk strikes on your account.
279.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
> If you lot are so deathly afraid of a tool taking over your job Not at all! You'll be sorely disappointed if you do actually get rid of the humans that you pay to solve your problems. > so we are not beholden to a bunch of over
280.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
> A very unlikely planet-killing asteroid There's heavy evidence there's already been a mass extinction once from an asteroid. > I can live with the odds. You may be able to, but a lot of people don't want to gamble th
281.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Because you can't adapt to a planet-killing asteroid. That's what the backup is for. Yes, you should focus on a primary, but that's no excuse to not have a backup.
282.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
People have other reasons of going. You don't colonize during the asteroid event, you colonize long before. You won't have people fighting to go to save themselves, you'll have them wanting to go for various reasons, legacy,
283.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
A dead battery is more of an issue than varying levels of thinness. Battery life, for a portable device, is probably the most important metric.
284.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
You've done nothing but ignore my words, misinterpret my bio, put words in my mouth, and spout off poor analogies. I think we're done conversing, if you could even call it that.
285.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
I'm sure there's a lot of anecdotes from male programmers about how difficult it is to get in and stay in the field, it's difficult. But if there is something to address, address the pain points specifically and directly. Don
286.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
I asked you the current regulation density and what your desired adjustment would be. I assume you knew since you were advocating loosening the restriction. What's the restriction? How much more dense should it be in your suggestion? U
287.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
The American colonies supplied the Brits with cotton. The system was setup to do so by UK. UK was buying the slave picked cotton well after they abolished/outsourced slavery. The UK even continued slavery in Indian colonies until 1843.
288.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
UK abolished slavery for themselves 30 years prior to the US abolishing it, mainly because their sugar plantations had lost their worth. But the UK still continued to buy US cotton, knowing full well it was enabling the slave trade to con
289.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Yes and that's a fallacy. If females don't want to go into programming then don't make them. There are really good female programmers, but males tend to be more frequent. We all have different traits that make us good at diff
290.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
So you think me not agreeing the US "was hugely racist" is the same as me saying slavery never happened? You don't think it's me saying that the US was part of a system that had existed long before it was even a country,
291.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
I wouldn't say "long" before. They did before, but they were also the ones who created those colonies with slaves in the first place. They were also buying those slave made goods, continuing the triangle, even well after they
292.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Where did I say it never happened? It's a bit disingenuous to put words in my mouth.
293.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Did I say that? Reply to what I say, not words you create. The system was created long before the US. Many people were involved in this system, from the warring tribes in Africa selling prisoners, to countries like the UK setting up colonie
294.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
> Anti-racism seeks to end that system. Explain how you apply "anti-racism" please. If you're excluding people based on their skin color or origins, that is racism, even if they are white or asian. > Everybody agrees th
295.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
It doesn't tell you how racist/sexist the system, it tells you your demographic. There being more male construction workers doesn't make it a sexist system. There being more female teachers doesn't make it a sexist syste
296.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Yeah doesn't make much sense right? Some people think that affirmative action isn't racist. But tell me what it is when you think like: "hey we have enough asians, exclude that person, let's find a black to get our quota
297.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Find a plot in New York City that isn't owned. If the owner isn't building housing, what makes you think new regulations will make them? How much denser would you like the new regulations to be btw? Do you know the current density
298.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Learn to use words properly, it's not bolshevism lol. How in the world would it be if they are privately owned buildings? Now if the government seized them, it would be. But yes there is a problem with cities like New York, but that&#x
299.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
No, and I guess you're the only one, please go inform the architects of your original idea. We could call them tallrises, skytouchers or something like that. You said: "Might be an easier solution than upending property rights ent
300.
by MrOwnPut 4y ago
Because there's no room left? Almost every square inch of New York is already covered.

More ›