Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
MrNeon
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
Neither the resources or the labor are public.
32.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
There is nothing secret to hide, what would be the purpose of blocking it?
33.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
Your phone example is just theft unless I'm misreading...do you want to go down the path of calling copyright infringement theft? As for the card example it is on you to keep secrets secret. It is clearly a fault with how credit cards
34.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
Data you put up on the internet is not your body. Do I really have to explain this? You know I don't. Do better.
35.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
> it’s basically the input data compressed with highly lossy compression. Okay, extract the images from a Stable Diffusion checkpoint then. I'll wait. It's not like lossy compression CAN'T be fair use or transformative. I&
36.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
Who said anything about creating a derivative? Surely you don't mean to say that any image created with a model trained on copyrighted data counts as a derivative of it. Edit: Or worse, that the model itself is derivative, something so
37.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
The tears of artists and copyright evangelists is so sweet.
38.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
Tell me where it says training a model is infringing on copyright.
39.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
That is how consent works.
40.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
Got all the permission I need when it was put on a publicly accessible server.
41.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
>why are you seeking to provide an “antidote” To train a model on the data.
42.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
I hope the idea of Intellectual Property as a whole is thrown out the window and copyright with it.
43.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
It is weird that it is not mentioned in the model card but I'm pretty sure it is a completion model, not tuned as an instruct model. edit: the webpage does call it "Stable Code Completion"
44.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
Right, so none of the instructions for GPT to call the DALL-E function, none of the prompt expansion rules and none of the censorship rules. Clearly the system prompt is not present in the file OpenAI gives us.
45.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
I don't have ChatGPT Plus to check that out. Could you share the latest DALL-E 3 system prompt?
46.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
I downloaded my chat history just now and system prompts are not present in it.
47.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
To say it can't “tell me what I just wrote” is to say it can't copy parts of the context. We know it can copy parts of the context and the system prompt while a special part of the context isn't immune to being copied. You ca
48.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
The audio is painfully AI right from the start, it lacks meaningful pauses.
49.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
It does do that but you can generate an image at the normal resolution and then scale it up to run more high-frequency sampling steps to add detail without losing the composition.
50.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
If my cheat puts my crosshair on the opponent's head automatically what about that information is untrustworthy that would make you throw it out?
51.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
IIRC quantizing small models causes a higher relative drop in the metrics.
52.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
Seriously? No rebuttal to my points, just dismissing me as a person? Edit: I don't mind if you insult me, as long as you back it up with facts. Like I did. I really want that Azure information and whether prefilling works there as it d
53.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
> a) gpt-3.5-turbo has a completion endpoint version as of June: `gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct` We were not talking about that model and I'm 99.999% sure you do not use that model. You might as well mention text-davinci-003 and all the le
54.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
> GPT 4 can continue a completion contrary to your belief When did I say that? I said they work differently. Claude has nothing in between the prefill and the result, OpenAI has tokens between the last assistant message and the result, t
55.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
> Are you going to have your user What fucking user, man? Is it not painfully clear I never spoke in the context of deploying applications? Your issues with this level of prefilling in the context of deployed apps ARE valid but I have no
56.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
You would have a point if it repeated the same "you are very annoying." over and over, which it does not. It generates new sentences, it is not regurgitating what is given. Would you say the same if the sentence was given as an ex
57.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
I made no comment on how prefilling is or isn't useful for deployed AI applications. I made no statement on which refusal mechanism is best for deployed AI applications. > Frankly comments like yours are why people are so dismissive
58.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
I know how it works because I stated how it works and have worked with it. You are telling me or showing me nothing new. I DID NOT say that any ONE prefill will make it bypass ALL disclaimers so your "You don't seem to understand
59.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
> It's a distinction without meaning once you know how it works But I do know how it works, I even said how it works. The distinction is not without meaning because Claude's prefill allows bypassing all refusals while GPT'
60.
▲
by
MrNeon
3y ago
> OpenAI allows the same via API usage I really don't think so unless I missed something. You can put an assistant message at the end but it won't continue directly from that, there will be special tokens in between which makes
More ›